Literature DB >> 9457017

Psychological influences on the timing of orthodontic treatment.

A W Tung1, H A Kiyak.   

Abstract

Debates about the "ideal" timing of orthodontic treatment have focused on issues of biologic development and readiness. In this article we examine psychologic issues that should be considered in the decision to initiate orthodontics in the younger child or to wait until adolescence or later. Psychologic development during the preadolescent and adolescent stages may influence the child's motive for, understanding of, and adherence to treatment regimens. Results of a study of some personality characteristics, motives, and aesthetic values of young phase I patients are presented. Questionnaires were completed by 75 children (mean age 10.85 years, 52.1% female, 84% white) and their parents. Children's perceived reasons for treatment were consistent with their parents' reports (chi 2 = 76.08, p < .001); most were referred for crowded teeth (56%) and overbite (17.3%). Although body image and self-concept scores were within the normal range, both children and their parents expected the most improvement in self-image and oral function, with greater expectations by parents on self-image (p < .0001), oral function (p < .0001), and social life (p < .03) than children themselves. Although white and minority children were similar in their self-ratings and expectations from orthodontics, the former were more critical in their aesthetic judgments. They rated faces with crowded teeth (p < .02), overbite (p < .02), and diastema (p < .01) more negatively than did ethnic minorities. These results suggest that younger children are good candidates for Phase I orthodontics, have high self-esteem and body-image, and expect orthodontics to improve their lives. White children who have been referred for Phase I orthodontics appear to have a narrower range of aesthetic acceptability than minority children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9457017     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70274-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  24 in total

1.  Analysis of clinical efficacy of interceptive treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion in a pair of twins through the use of two modified removable appliances.

Authors:  R Condò; C Perugia; M Bartolino; R Docimo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-13

2.  Oral health-related quality of life after orthodontic treatment for anterior tooth alignment: Association with emotional state and sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Jana Kolenda; Helge Fischer-Brandies; Robert Ciesielski; Bernd Koos
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Factors associated with the desire for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents.

Authors:  Leandro S Marques; Isabela A Pordeus; Maria L Ramos-Jorge; Cid A Filogônio; Cintia B Filogônio; Luciano J Pereira; Saul M Paiva
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Yafen Zhu; Hu Long; Yang Zhou; Fan Jian; Niansong Ye; Meiya Gao; Wenli Lai
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Self-concept and the perception of facial appearance in children and adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; Kimberly N Edwards Beal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Perceptions of dental aesthetics of Class III and anterior open bite malocclusions: a comparison between 10- to 11-year-old schoolchildren and orthodontists.

Authors:  Ahmad Mohammad Hamdan; Vinita Singh; William Rock
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Level of Social Appearance Anxiety in Individuals with and without Alignment of Teeth.

Authors:  Mihri Amasyalı; Fidan Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Effect of fixed mechanotherapy on psychosocial impact of malocclusion using PIDAQ in the Indian population - A follow up study.

Authors:  Gayatri Ganesh; Tulika Tripathi; Priyank Rai
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-12-03

9.  Impact of the first eight months of orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance on the families of adolescent patients.

Authors:  Lucas G Abreu; Camilo A Melgaço; Mauro H N G Abreu; Elizabeth M B Lages; Saul M Paiva
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople.

Authors:  Federica Santori; Francesco Masedu; Domenico Ciavarella; Edoardo Staderini; Claudio Chimenti; Michele Tepedino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.