Literature DB >> 9455626

10 years of patch testing with the (meth)acrylate series.

L Kanerva1, R Jolanki, T Estlander.   

Abstract

Statistics on 10 years of patch testing with 30 (meth)acrylates were compiled. Altogether 275 patients were patch tested and 48 patients (17.5%) had an allergic reaction to at least 1 (meth)acrylate. The (meth)acrylates most often provoking an allergic patch test reaction were 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (2-HEA; 12.1%), 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA; 12.0%) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA; 11.4%). No allergic reactions were caused by 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (2-EHA), 2,2-bis[4-(methacryloxy)phenyl]propane (BIS-MA), trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA), oligotriacrylate 480 (OTA 480), N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (MBAA), or ethyl cyanoacrylate (ECA). The frequency of allergic patch test reactions presented cannot be considered as a "ranking" list of the most sensitizing (meth)acrylate compounds. In order to be able to judge the sensitization capacity of various (meth)acrylate compounds in humans, it would be necessary to have detailed information on the exposure history of the patients studied, including the purity of the (meth)acrylate compounds. Currently, this is not possible because (meth)acrylate-containing products regularly contain undeclared (meth)acrylate compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9455626     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb02460.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of methods of high-pressure freezing and automated freeze-substitution of suspension cells combined with LR White embedding.

Authors:  Margarita Sobol; Vlada V Philimonenko; Pavel Hozák
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  A method for preserving ultrastructural properties of mitotic cells for subsequent immunogold labeling using low-temperature embedding in LR White resin.

Authors:  Margarita Sobol; Jana Nebesářová; Pavel Hozák
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Contact dermatitis due to methyl methacrylate: uncommon and unwanted entity for dentists.

Authors:  Paranjay Prajapati; Rajesh Sethuraman; Sucheta Bector; Jayanti R Patel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-12-17

4.  Adhesives Used for Diabetes Medical Devices: A Neglected Risk With Serious Consequences?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Stefanie Kamann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Randomized clinical evaluation of a light-cured base material for complete dentures.

Authors:  Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Wolfgang Bömicke; Alexander J Hassel; Peter Rammelsberg; Thomas Stober
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Human T lymphocyte priming in vitro by haptenated autologous dendritic cells.

Authors:  T Rustemeyer; S De Ligter; B M Von Blomberg; P J Frosch; R J Scheper
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  The evaluation of water sorption/solubility on various acrylic resins.

Authors:  Suleyman Hakan Tuna; Filiz Keyf; Hasan Onder Gumus; Cengiz Uzun
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-07

8.  Determination of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) mechanical properties as a denture material.

Authors:  Saja A Muhsin; Paul V Hatton; Anthony Johnson; Nuno Sereno; Duncan J Wood
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-03-13

9.  A Polymer for Application as a Matrix Phase in a Concept of In Situ Curable Bioresorbable Bioactive Load-Bearing Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composite Fracture Fixation Plates.

Authors:  Artem Plyusnin; Jingwei He; Cindy Elschner; Miho Nakamura; Julia Kulkova; Axel Spickenheuer; Christina Scheffler; Lippo V J Lassila; Niko Moritz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.