Literature DB >> 9455271

A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management.

S Bale1, D Squires, T Varnon, A Walker, M Benbow, K G Harding.   

Abstract

This study compared a polyurethane foam dressing with a hydrocolloid dressing for ease of application and removal, adhesion, conformability, absorbency and wear time. A randomised study was carried out, including 61 patients with stage two or three pressure sores in five centres in the UK. Dressings were applied for up to 30 days and assessments were carried out at each dressing change. The results indicated that both dressings are easy and convenient to apply; absorbency and ease of removal were significantly better with the polyurethane foam dressing than the hydrocolloid dressing; wear times were similar.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9455271     DOI： 10.12968/jowc.1997.6.10.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN： 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  7 in total

Review 1.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 2.  Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice?

Authors:  F Dinah; A Adhikari
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes.

Authors:  Mireia Guillén-Solà; Aina Soler Mieras; Antònia M Tomàs-Vidal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  The effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressings versus other dressings in the healing of pressure ulcers in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Franciele Soares Pott; Marineli Joaquim Meier; Janislei Giseli Dorociak Stocco; Karla Crozeta; Janyne Dayane Ribas
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2014 May-Jun

6.  A US hospital budget impact analysis of a skin closure system compared with standard of care in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kay Sadik; Jana Flener; Jeanine Gargiulo; Zachary Post; Steven Wurzelbacher; Andrew Hogan; Sarah Hollmann; Nicole Ferko
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-12-17

7.  Effectiveness of Hydrocolloid Dressings for Treating Pressure Ulcers in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Sylwia Kamińska; Anna Maria Cybulska; Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka; Katarzyna Augustyniuk; Elżbieta Grochans; Beata Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.390
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.