Literature DB >> 9454926

Efficacy of recombinant fowl poxvirus vaccine in protecting chickens against a highly pathogenic Mexican-origin H5N2 avian influenza virus.

D E Swayne1, J R Beck, T R Mickle.   

Abstract

Internationally and nationally, governments and the poultry industries have used various strategies to control avian influenza (AI), ranging from a minimum of living with mildly pathogenic AI virus (AIV) infections to the other extreme of implementing a total quarantine-slaughter approach for eradication of highly pathogenic (HP) forms of the disease. However, recent economic considerations in various countries have prompted a broader reevaluation of vaccination as one of several tools to be used in AI control programs, including H5 and H7 HP AI. In the current study, 1-day-old chickens were immunized with a recombinant fowl poxvirus vaccine containing a hemagglutinin gene insert (Vector-HA) from an H5 AIV. Vector-HA- and negative control (vector-control)-vaccinated chicks were challenged with a HP H5N2 AIV isolated from chickens in Mexico. All immunized chickens were antibody negative on the agar gel precipitin test, indicating that vaccination would not interfere with routine AI serologic surveillance programs in the United States. However, in the hemagglutinin-inhibition test, a few immunized chickens (8%) had low serologic titers. Protection against illness (90-100%) and death (90-100%) was provided by the vector-HA vaccine from 3 wk of age to the end of the 20-wk study. The number of chickens shedding the challenge AIV from their enteric tracts was significantly reduced (50-75%) and the quantity of challenge AIV shed from respiratory and enteric tracts was significantly reduced (10(1)-10(2.1) mean embryo lethal dose/ml) in most vector-HA vaccine groups when compared with vector-control groups. Furthermore, vector-HA vaccination reduced in contact transmission of HP AI challenge virus to both vector-HA- and vector-control-vaccinated chickens. These findings indicate the recombinant fowl poxvirus vaccine can be a useful tool in an AI control program by preventing illness and death in chickens and reducing intestinal and respiratory shedding of H5 AIV. However, for an AI control program to be successful, enhanced biosecurity and surveillance must be practiced, and the vaccine's use must be controlled by an industry and/or government task force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9454926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  7 in total

Review 1.  Success factors for avian influenza vaccine use in poultry and potential impact at the wild bird-agricultural interface.

Authors:  David E Swayne; Erica Spackman; Mary Pantin-Jackwood
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Development of an effective polyvalent vaccine against both Marek's and Newcastle diseases based on recombinant Marek's disease virus type 1 in commercial chickens with maternal antibodies.

Authors:  K Sonoda; M Sakaguchi; H Okamura; K Yokogawa; E Tokunaga; S Tokiyoshi; Y Kawaguchi; K Hirai
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Phylogenetic analysis, molecular changes, and adaptation to chickens of Mexican lineage H5N2 low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses from 1994 to 2019.

Authors:  Sungsu Youk; Christina M Leyson; Darren J Parris; Henry M Kariithi; David L Suarez; Mary J Pantin-Jackwood
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.521

4.  Effect of passive immunization on immunogenicity and protective efficacy of vaccination against a Mexican low-pathogenic avian H5N2 influenza virus.

Authors:  Heather L Forrest; Alejandro Garcia; Angela Danner; Jon P Seiler; Kimberly Friedman; Robert G Webster; Jeremy C Jones
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 5.  Novel Vaccine Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: A Herald to Human Medicine Vaccines.

Authors:  Virginia Aida; Vasilis C Pliasas; Peter J Neasham; J Fletcher North; Kirklin L McWhorter; Sheniqua R Glover; Constantinos S Kyriakis
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Identification of a dual-specific T cell epitope of the hemagglutinin antigen of an h5 avian influenza virus in chickens.

Authors:  Hamid R Haghighi; Leah R Read; S M Mansour Haeryfar; Shahriar Behboudi; Shayan Sharif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Antigen delivery systems for veterinary vaccine development. Viral-vector based delivery systems.

Authors:  Alejandro Brun; Emmanuel Albina; Tom Barret; David A G Chapman; Markus Czub; Linda K Dixon; Günther M Keil; Bernard Klonjkowski; Marie-Frédérique Le Potier; Geneviève Libeau; Javier Ortego; Jennifer Richardson; Haru-H Takamatsu
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.641

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.