Literature DB >> 9453117

Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study.

B Qureshi1, K Inafuku, K Oshima, H Masamoto, K Kanazawa.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized study was conducted to measure the serial thickness of the lower uterine segment (LUS) by transvaginal ultrasonography in a control group of 80 women having no history of uterine surgery and in a study group of 43 women having a history of previous cesarean section (C/S). In the study group, more than 2 mm of thickness of the LUS was considered as good healing and less than 2 mm of thickness as poor healing. After serial sonographic examination, the women with good healing were given trial for labor unless an obstetrical indication for C/S existed. The appearance of the LUS during surgery was compared with antenatal ultrasonographic assessment by direct inspection. Twenty two (79%) of 28 women with a well healed scar had trial labor with the result that 46% had a successful vaginal birth without any uterine rupture of dehiscence. Eight women with poor healing all had elective C/S. Seven women with a 2 mm LUS thickness were individually categorized for delivery mode. Two of those women delivered vaginally. The LUS was found to be thin to translucent in these later two groups. Two mm or less as a criterion for poor healing had the sensitivity and specificity of 86.7% and 100% respectively. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 86.7%. Ultrasonographic evaluation is effective in predicting the quality of a uterine scar and in differentiating the risk group of probable uterine rupture from the non risk group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9453117     DOI: 10.1620/tjem.183.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med        ISSN: 0040-8727            Impact factor:   1.848


  7 in total

1.  Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section.

Authors:  Chanderdeep Sharma; Mukesh Surya; Anjali Soni; Pawan Kumar Soni; Ashok Verma; Suresh Verma
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-11-04

2.  Uterine rupture at 28 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy - a case report.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tomczyk; Maciej Wilczak; Paweł Rzymski
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2018-06-30

3.  The INTEGRITY Trial: Preservation of Uterine-Wall Integrity 12 Months After Transcervical Fibroid Ablation with the Sonata System.

Authors:  Marlies Bongers; Janesh Gupta; José Gerardo Garza-Leal; Matthew Brown; Ricardo Felberbaum
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2019-10-04

4.  Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3 T MRI.

Authors:  Janine Hoffmann; Marc Exner; Kristina Bremicker; Matthias Grothoff; Patrick Stumpp; Holger Stepan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance morphometry and sonography in assessment of post-cesarean uterine scar.

Authors:  Gayatri Satpathy; Ishan Kumar; Manjari Matah; Ashish Verma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

6.  Safety and feasibility of trial of labor in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum.

Authors:  Xiuqiong Zheng; Jianying Yan; Zhaozhen Liu; Xuechun Wang; Rongli Xu; Liying Li; Zhi Lin; Lianghui Zheng; Min Liu; Yan Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Zhengfeng Zhu; HeZhou Li; JunQing Zhang
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.