Literature DB >> 9453105

Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology.

A S Bright1, B Torpey, D Magid, T Codd, E G McFarland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bigliani's classification system of acromial morphology utilizing the standard outlet radiograph has become in accepted method for evaluating patients with rotator cuff disease. This study evaluates the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Bigliani's classification system using observers at various levels of training. PATIENTS AND
DESIGN: Supraspinatus outlet view radiographs of 40 patients (aged 18-78 years) with shoulder pain were reviewed twice, 4 months apart, in a masked protocol by six reviewers, including two attending (fellowship-trained) shoulder surgeons, an attending musculoskeletal radiologist, an orthopedic surgery sports fellow, and two orthopedic residents (PGY-2 and PGY-5). The reviewers were given standard diagrams of the Bigliani classification system and were asked to classify each film as a type I, II, or III acromion. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability values were calculated using kappa statistic analysis (0-0.2 slight, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.6 moderate, 0.61-0.8 substantial, and 0.8-1.0 excellent). RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: For each of the two readings, all six observers agreed only 18% of the time. Kappa values for pairwise comparison of interobserver reliability among the six observers ranged from 0.01 to 0.75 (mean 0.35), and intraobserver repeatability ranged from 0.26 (PGY-5 resident) to 0.80 (fellowship-trained surgeon), with a mean of 0.55. Intraobserver repeatability was not significantly different for the different levels of expertise. More definitive criteria are needed to distinguish and classify the acromion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9453105     DOI: 10.1007/s002560050317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  16 in total

Review 1.  The significance of quality of life in health care.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Clinically significant skeletal variations of the shoulder and the wrist: role of MR imaging.

Authors:  J M Mellado; J Calmet; S Domènech; A Saurí
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Pit above the lesser tuberosity in axial view radiography.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Cho; Kyeong-Jin Han; Doo-Hyung Lee; Nam-Su Chung; Do Young Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical Faceoff: What is the Role of Acromioplasty in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease?

Authors:  Edward G McFarland; Frederick A Matsen; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Relationship of radiographic acromial characteristics and rotator cuff disease: a prospective investigation of clinical, radiographic, and sonographic findings.

Authors:  Nady Hamid; Reza Omid; Ken Yamaguchi; Karen Steger-May; Georgia Stobbs; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Reliability of determining and measuring acromial enthesophytes.

Authors:  Keith M Baumgarten; James L Carey; Joseph A Abboud; Grant L Jones; John E Kuhn; Brian R Wolf; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Rick W Wright; Armando F Vidal; C Benjamin Ma; Eric C McCarty; G Brian Holloway; Edwin E Spencer; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-07-13

7.  Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Dennis Liem; Oliver Greshake; Juergen Hoeher; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Communication breakdown: clinicians disagree on subacromial impingement.

Authors:  Pieter Bas de Witte; Jurriaan H de Groot; Erik W van Zwet; Paula M Ludewig; Jochem Nagels; Rob G H H Nelissen; Jon P Braman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Impingement is not impingement: the case for calling it "Rotator Cuff Disease".

Authors:  Edward G McFarland; Nicola Maffulli; Angelo Del Buono; George A C Murrell; Juan Garzon-Muvdi; Steve A Petersen
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-08-11

10.  [Acute osseous traumatic lesions of the shoulder girdle].

Authors:  M O Philipp; S Philipp-Hauser; C Gäbler; M Breitenseher
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.