Literature DB >> 9452799

[Treatment of trochanteric fractures by external fixator].

L Badras1, E Skretas, E D Vayanos.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to report and evaluate the place of external fixation in the treatment of trochanteric fractures in patients with high unacceptable operative risk to withstand conventional osteosynthesis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1990 to December 1991 (2 years period), 42 patients, 13 males and 29 female, mean age 84.1 years, suffering from trochanteric fracture and considered preoperatively as "poor medical status" were treated by external fixation and immediate mobilisation. The average operative time was 18 minutes and no blood transfusion was necessary per or post-operatively. The mean hospital stay was 19 days.
RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 6 months post-operatively. During this time 8 patients (19 per cent) died due to medical problems unrelated to the fracture. All fractures united in an acceptable position at an average time of 10.4 weeks with no loss of reduction, no pin breakage, no deep infection. All hips were painless. COMPLICATIONS: proximal pin migration occurred in 3 patients (7 per cent) due to fracture impaction and superficial pin tract infection in 16 (38 per cent) with no further consequence. DISCUSSION: External fixation in trochanteric fractures has been applied since 1957 with good results. This series confirms the advantages of the method in patients with a high operative risk; these are short operative time, minimal blood loss, early mobilisation and acceptable morbidity and mortality rates, considering the old and senile age group with poor medical condition, not allowing conventional treatment. The minor complications such as superficial pin tract infection and proximal pin migration are easily controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9452799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot        ISSN: 0035-1040


  4 in total

1.  Management of trochanteric fractures of the femur with external fixation in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Navin Kumar Karn; Giris Kumar Singh; Pankaj Kumar; Mahi Pal Singh; Bikram Prasad Shrestha; Pashupati Chaudhary
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of the Dynamic Hip Screw with the Dynamic Hip External Fixator for Intertrochanteric Fractures: Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ali Moradi; Meisam Moradi; Maryam Emadzadeh; Farshid Bagheri
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

3.  Proximal screws placement in intertrochanteric fractures treated with external fixation: comparison of two different techniques.

Authors:  Marios D Vekris; Marios G Lykissas; Gregory Manoudis; Alexandros N Mavrodontidis; Christos D Papageorgiou; Anastasios V Korompilias; Ioannis P Kostas-Agnantis; Alexandros E Beris
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  External Fixation vs. Skeletal Traction for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly.

Authors:  Gholam Hossein Kazemian; Mohammad Emami; Alireza Manafi; Farideh Najafi; Mohammad Amin Najafi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2016-02-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.