BACKGROUND: Traditionally, primary surgical therapy is considered unsuitable for the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC). Multiple reports have documented the efficacy of primary chemotherapy in this group of patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a multimodality treatment program in reducing distant and local disease relapses in patients with LABC. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with large operable or inoperable Stage III breast carcinoma, median tumor greatest dimension 7 x 8 cm, were treated with neoadjuvant MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) to achieve maximum clinical response, followed by modified radical mastectomy, adjuvant MVAC for six courses, and chest wall radiation. Of these patients, 37 had Stage IIIA disease and 18 had Stage IIIB or inflammatory breast carcinoma. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients achieved overall responses to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 16 complete clinical remissions. Histopathologic evaluation was performed for all patients; nine were pathologically free of disease and six had residual intraductal carcinoma only. After a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 8-76 months), 24 patients had relapsed: 6 locoregional and distant, and 18 distant only. The median disease free and overall survival have not been reached; the 5-year disease free and overall survival rates are 51% and 63%, respectively. The number of lymph nodes with metastases was found to be an independent predictor of relapse in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary approach produced an excellent local control rate and a respectable 5-year distant relapse free rate. Axillary lymphadenectomy after primary chemotherapy provides crucial prognostic information, which can be important in planning multimodality treatment of patients with LABC.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, primary surgical therapy is considered unsuitable for the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC). Multiple reports have documented the efficacy of primary chemotherapy in this group of patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a multimodality treatment program in reducing distant and local disease relapses in patients with LABC. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with large operable or inoperable Stage III breast carcinoma, median tumor greatest dimension 7 x 8 cm, were treated with neoadjuvant MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) to achieve maximum clinical response, followed by modified radical mastectomy, adjuvant MVAC for six courses, and chest wall radiation. Of these patients, 37 had Stage IIIA disease and 18 had Stage IIIB or inflammatory breast carcinoma. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients achieved overall responses to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 16 complete clinical remissions. Histopathologic evaluation was performed for all patients; nine were pathologically free of disease and six had residual intraductal carcinoma only. After a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 8-76 months), 24 patients had relapsed: 6 locoregional and distant, and 18 distant only. The median disease free and overall survival have not been reached; the 5-year disease free and overall survival rates are 51% and 63%, respectively. The number of lymph nodes with metastases was found to be an independent predictor of relapse in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary approach produced an excellent local control rate and a respectable 5-year distant relapse free rate. Axillary lymphadenectomy after primary chemotherapy provides crucial prognostic information, which can be important in planning multimodality treatment of patients with LABC.
Authors: Sylvia Adams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Martin Donach; Darcy Spicer; Stella Lymberis; Baljit Singh; Joshua A Bauer; Tsivia Hochman; Judith D Goldberg; Franco Muggia; Robert J Schneider; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Silvia C Formenti Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M Tanioka; C Shimizu; K Yonemori; K Yoshimura; K Tamura; T Kouno; M Ando; N Katsumata; H Tsuda; T Kinoshita; Y Fujiwara Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Claudia Arce; Carlos Pérez-Plasencia; Aurora González-Fierro; Erick de la Cruz-Hernández; Alma Revilla-Vázquez; Alma Chávez-Blanco; Catalina Trejo-Becerril; Enrique Pérez-Cárdenas; Lucia Taja-Chayeb; Enrique Bargallo; Patricia Villarreal; Teresa Ramírez; Teresa Vela; Myrna Candelaria; Maria F Camargo; Elizabeth Robles; Alfonso Dueñas-González Journal: PLoS One Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: P Chollet; S Amat; H Cure; M de Latour; G Le Bouedec; M-A Mouret-Reynier; J-P Ferriere; J-L Achard; J Dauplat; F Penault-Llorca Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-04-08 Impact factor: 7.640