Epidural versus general anesthesia: does anesthetic management influence early infrainguinal graft thrombosis?

A few contemporary reports have suggested that the use of epidural anesthesia may favorably influence early graft patency in patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization. In order to test this hypothesis, we have retrospectively reviewed our experience with 303 primary femoropopliteal-tibial bypass procedures in 294 patients from January 1989 through June 1994. A total of 145 of these operations were done under epidural anesthesia (EA) and 158 under general anesthesia (GA); the demographic profiles for the patients in both of these groups were nearly identical. Thirteen patients (4.2%) died during the perioperative period (EA 3.4%, GA 5.0%; p = 0.48). Early graft thrombosis occurred in 35 patients (12%) during the same hospital admission (EA 14%, GA 9.4%; p = 0.28). There were no significant differences in the graft thrombosis rates for EA and GA with respect to surgical indications (claudication versus limb salvage), graft materials (vein versus synthetic), or the extent of revascularization (popliteal versus crural). Most graft failures appeared to be related to such conventional factors as disadvantaged outflow vessels and/or specific technical complications. Therefore, we conclude that the choice between EA and GA should continue to be made selectively on the basis of traditional anesthetic considerations.