Literature DB >> 9451928

Burn wound infections: current status.

B A Pruitt1, A T McManus, S H Kim, C W Goodwin.   

Abstract

The burn wound represents a susceptible site for opportunistic colonization by organisms of endogenous and exogenous origin. Patient factors such as age, extent of injury, and depth of burn in combination with microbial factors such as type and number of organisms, enzyme and toxin production, and motility determine the likelihood of invasive burn wound infection. Burn wound infections can be classified on the basis of the causative organism, the depth of invasion, and the tissue response. Diagnostic procedures and therapy must be based on an understanding of the pathophysiology of the burn wound and the pathogenesis of the various forms of burn wound infection. The time-related changes in the predominant flora of the burn wound from gram-positive to gram-negative recapitulate the history of burn wound infection. Proper clinical and culture surveillance of the burn wound permits early diagnosis of gram-positive cellulitis, and the stable susceptibility of beta-hemolytic streptococci to penicillin has eliminated the threat of this once common burn wound pathogen. Selection and dissemination of intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms increase the probability of burn wound colonization by resistant species such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Even so, effective topical antimicrobial chemotherapy and early burn wound excision have significantly reduced the overall occurrence of invasive burn wound infections. Individual patients, usually those with extensive burns in whom wound closure is difficult to achieve, may still develop a variety of bacterial and nonbacterial burn wound infections. Consequently, the entirety of the burn wound must be examined on a daily basis by the attending surgeon. Any change in wound appearance, with or without associated clinical changes, should be evaluated by biopsy. Quantitative cultures of the biopsy sample may identify predominant organisms but are not useful for making the diagnosis of invasive burn wound infection. Histologic examination of the biopsy specimen, which permits staging the invasive process, is the only reliable means of differentiating wound colonization from invasive infection. Identification of the histologic changes characteristic of bacterial, fungal, and viral infections facilitates the selection of appropriate therapy. A diagnosis of invasive burn wound infection necessitates change of both local and systemic therapy and, in the case of bacterial and fungal infections, prompt surgical removal of the infected tissue. Even after the wounds of extensively burned patients have healed or been grafted, burn wound impetigo, commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, may occur in the form of multifocal, small superficial abscesses that require surgical debridement. Current techniques of burn wound care have significantly reduced the incidence of invasive burn wound infection, altered the organisms causing the infections that do occur, increased the interval between injury and the onset of infection, reduced the mortality associated with infection, decreased the overall incidence of infection in burn patients, and increased burn patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9451928     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  96 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Intensive care management and control of infection.

Authors:  Mark Ansermino; Carolyn Hemsley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-24

3.  An alternative for local treatment of superficial burns.

Authors:  D Enescu; T Bratu; P Berechet-Comanescu; D Ionita
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2008-09-30

4.  Efficacy of bacteriophage therapy against gut-derived sepsis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mice.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Tetsuya Matsumoto; Go Sano; Yoshikazu Ishii; Kazuhiro Tateda; Yoshinobu Sumiyama; Jumpei Uchiyama; Shingo Sakurai; Shigenobu Matsuzaki; Shosuke Imai; Keizo Yamaguchi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  DNA binding: a novel function of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type IV pili.

Authors:  Erin J van Schaik; Carmen L Giltner; Gerald F Audette; David W Keizer; Daisy L Bautista; Carolyn M Slupsky; Brian D Sykes; Randall T Irvin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the National Center for Burns in Casablanca, Morocco.

Authors:  A Rafik; M Diouri; N Bahechar; A Chlihi
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Anti-biofilm efficacy of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Evan M Hetrick; Jae Ho Shin; Heather S Paul; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  The complex interplay of iron, biofilm formation, and mucoidy affecting antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Amanda G Oglesby-Sherrouse; Louise Djapgne; Angela T Nguyen; Adriana I Vasil; Michael L Vasil
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.166

9.  Insulin increases resistance to burn wound infection-associated sepsis.

Authors:  Gerd G Gauglitz; Tracy E Toliver-Kinsky; Felicia N Williams; Juquan Song; Weihua Cui; David N Herndon; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Effect of silver-doped phosphate-based glasses on bacterial biofilm growth.

Authors:  Sabeel P Valappil; Jonathan C Knowles; Michael Wilson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.