Literature DB >> 9451677

Homeopathy for postoperative ileus? A meta-analysis.

J Barnes1, K L Resch, E Ernst.   

Abstract

Homeopathic remedies are advocated for the treatment of postoperative ileus, yet data from clinical trials are inconclusive. We therefore performed meta-analyses of existing clinical trials to determine whether homeopathic treatment has any greater effect than placebo administration on the restoration of intestinal peristalsis in patients after abdominal or gynecologic surgery. We conducted systematic literature searches to identify relevant clinical trials. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan software. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for any homeopathic treatment versus placebo; homeopathic remedies of < 12C potency versus placebo; homeopathic remedies of > or = 12C potency versus placebo. A "sensitivity analysis" was performed to test the effect of excluding studies of low methodologic quality. Our endpoint was time to first flatus. Meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) weighted mean difference (WMD) in favor of homeopathy (compared with placebo) on the time to first flatus. Meta-analyses of the three studies that compared homeopathic remedies > or = 12C versus placebo showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). Meta-analyses of studies comparing homeopathic remedies < 12C with placebo indicated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) WMD in favor of homeopathy on the time to first flatus. Excluding methodologically weak trials did not substantially change any of the results. There is evidence that homeopathic treatment can reduce the duration of ileus after abdominal or gynecologic surgery. However, several caveats preclude a definitive judgment. These results should form the basis of a randomized controlled trial to resolve the issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9451677     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-199712000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  9 in total

Review 1.  Quality, efficacy and safety of complementary medicines: fashions, facts and the future. Part II: Efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Joanne Barnes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Acute Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08

3.  Homoeopathy.

Authors:  S O'Meara; P Wilson; C Bridle; K Wright; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

Review 4.  A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Elijah Dixon; Morad Hameed; Francis Sutherland; Deborah J Cook; Christopher Doig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  [Paralytic ileus after ileocystoplasty in a patient with spinal cord injury: is homeopathy helpful?].

Authors:  J Pannek; S Pannek-Rademacher; M C Jus; M S Jus
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  High-field 1H T(1) and T(2) NMR relaxation time measurements of H2O in homeopathic preparations of quartz, sulfur, and copper sulfate.

Authors:  Stephan Baumgartner; Martin Wolf; Peter Skrabal; Felix Bangerter; Peter Heusser; André Thurneysen; Ursula Wolf
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-06-17

Review 8.  Systematic reviews of complementary therapies - an annotated bibliography. Part 3: homeopathy.

Authors:  K Linde; M Hondras; A Vickers; G ter Riet; D Melchart
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Serious mistakes in meta-analysis of homeopathic research.

Authors:  G Vithoulkas
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.