Literature DB >> 9451602

Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl.

H V McLachlan1.   

Abstract

The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9451602      PMCID： PMC1377575          DOI： 10.1136/jme.23.6.344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  The ethics of surrogacy: women's reproductive labour.

Authors:  A van Niekerk; L van Zyl
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.903
  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Surrogate motherhood, rights and duties: a reply to Campbell.

Authors:  H V McLachlan; J K Swales
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Selling organs and souls: should the state prohibit 'demeaning' practices?

Authors:  Dominic J C Wilkinson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood.

Authors:  L van Zyl; A van Niekerk
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Babies, child bearers and commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al., and the political economy of commercial surrogate motherhood.

Authors:  H V McLachlan; J K Swales
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2000
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.