Literature DB >> 9451546

Systematic assessment of social phobia in clinical practice.

D B Clark1, U Feske, C L Masia, S A Spaulding, C Brown, O Mammen, M K Shear.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to propose a systematic approach to the assessment of social phobia for monitoring treatment outcome in clinical settings. A selection of measures is available, including questionnaires and structured interviews varying in length, complexity, and content. To design an assessment protocol for a particular patient or patient population, the clinician needs to be familiar with the characteristics of these available measures. The measures selected for detailed description and discussion here: (a) are specifically designed to assess social anxiety and social phobia, (b) have been demonstrated to have acceptable psychometric characteristics, and (c) have been utilized in treatment outcome research. Five questionnaire measures will be reviewed: (1) the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI) (Turner et al., 1989a: Psychol Assessment 1:35-40), (2) the Social Interaction and Anxiety Scale (SIAS) (Mattick and Clarke, 1989 in Heimberg et al., 1992), (3) the Social Phobia Scale (SPS) (Mattick and Clarke, 1989 in Heimberg et al., 1992: Behav Therapy 23:53-73), (4) the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (FNES) (Watson and Friend, 1969: J Consult Clin Psychol 33:448-457), and (5) The Social Anxiety and Distress Scale (SADS) (Watson and Friend, 1969: J Consult Clin Psychol 33:448-457). Two interview measures will be reviewed, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) (Liebowitz, 1987: Modern Problems Pharmacopsych 22:141-173) and Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS) (Davidson et al., 1991: J Clin Psychiatry 52:48-51). Measures developed for specific subgroups, including patients with speech anxiety and musical performance anxiety, as well as the application of other evaluation methods, such as the Behavioral Assessment Test, will also be discussed. Guidelines for selecting appropriate social phobia measures for varying clinical and research situations will be proposed that take into consideration the strengths and weaknesses of these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9451546     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1997)6:2<47::aid-da1>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Depress Anxiety        ISSN: 1091-4269            Impact factor:   6.505


  6 in total

1.  Psychological treatment of social anxiety disorder improves body dysmorphic concerns.

Authors:  Angela Fang; Alice T Sawyer; Idan M Aderka; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-08-06

2.  Factor structure of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Eric A Storch; Carrie Masia-Warner; Amanda D Heidgerken; Paige H Fisher; Donna B Pincus; Michael R Liebowitz
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Evidence based clinical assessment of child and adolescent social phobia: a critical review of rating scales.

Authors:  Bogdan T Tulbure; Aurora Szentagotai; Anca Dobrean; Daniel David
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2012-10

4.  Working hard for oneself or others: Effects of oxytocin on reward motivation in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Angela Fang; Michael T Treadway; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Cultural Differences in Fear of Negative Evaluation After Social Norm Transgressions and the Impact on Mental Health.

Authors:  Mamta Vaswani; Victoria M Esses; Ian R Newby-Clark; Benjamin Giguère
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-13

6.  The dutch social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale: reliability, validity, and clinical utility.

Authors:  Edwin de Beurs; Deirdre Tielen; Lisa Wollmann
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2014-02-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.