Literature DB >> 9449675

Localization of genes encoding egg modifiers of paternal genome function to mouse chromosomes one and two.

K E Latham1, C Sapienza.   

Abstract

It is now well established that genomic imprinting effects in mammals require a combination of epigenetic modifications imposed during gametogenesis and additional modifications imposed after fertilization. The earliest post-fertilization modifications to be imposed on the genome are those thought to be mediated by factors in the egg cytoplasm. Strain-dependent differences in the actions of these egg modifiers in mice reveal an important potential for genetic variability in the imprinting process, and also provide valuable genetic systems with which to identify some of the factors that participate in imprinting. Previous studies documented a strain-dependent difference in the modification of paternal genome function between the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mouse strains. This difference is revealed as a difference in developmental potential of androgenetic embryos produced with eggs from females of the two strains by nuclear transplantation. The specificity of the effect for the paternal genome is consistent with an effect on imprinted genes. The egg phenotype is largely independent of the genotype of the fertilizing sperm, and the C57BL/6 phenotype is dominant in reciprocal F1 hybrids. Genetic studies demonstrated that the difference in egg phenotypes between the two strains is most likely controlled by two independently segregating loci. We now report the results of experiments in which the egg phenotypes of the available BxD recombinant inbred mouse strains have been determined. The results of the analysis are consistent with the two locus model, and we have identified candidate chromosomal locations for the two loci. These data demonstrate clearly that differences in how the egg cytoplasm modifies the incoming paternal genome are indeed genetically determined, and vary accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9449675     DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.5.929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  8 in total

1.  Genetic conflicts in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  A Burt; R Trivers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genotypic divergence in mouse oocyte transcriptomes: possible pathways to hybrid vigor impacting fertility and embryogenesis.

Authors:  Ashley L Severance; Uros Midic; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Effects of ooplasm transfer on paternal genome function in mice.

Authors:  Cheng-Guang Liang; Zhiming Han; Yong Cheng; Zhisheng Zhong; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Effects of ooplasm manipulation on DNA methylation and growth of progeny in mice.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; Kai Wang; Lori D Kellam; Young S Lee; Cheng-Guang Liang; Zhiming Han; Namdori R Mtango; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Cleavage Speed and Blastomere Number in DBA/2J Compared with C57BL/6J Mouse Embryos.

Authors:  Hirofumi Nishizono; Kyosuke Uno; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Elevated non-esterified fatty acid concentrations during bovine oocyte maturation compromise early embryo physiology.

Authors:  Veerle Van Hoeck; Roger G Sturmey; Pablo Bermejo-Alvarez; Dimitrios Rizos; Alfonso Gutierrez-Adan; Henry J Leese; Peter E J Bols; Jo L M R Leroy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Generation of Ugt1-deficient murine liver cell lines using TALEN technology.

Authors:  Fabiola Porro; Luka Bockor; Alessia De Caneva; Giulia Bortolussi; Andrés F Muro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Age-related alterations in fertilization-induced Ca2+ oscillations depend on the genetic background of mouse oocytes†.

Authors:  Katarzyna Czajkowska; Agnieszka Walewska; Takao Ishikawa; Katarzyna Szczepańska; Anna Ajduk
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.285

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.