Literature DB >> 9448438

Explaining social class differences in depression and well-being.

S A Stansfeld1, J Head, M G Marmot.   

Abstract

Work characteristics, including skill discretion and decision authority, explain most of the socioeconomic status gradient in well-being and depression in middle-aged British civil servants from the Whitehall II Study, London. Social support explained about one-third of the gradient, life events and material difficulties less than one-third. Socioeconomic status was measured by employment grade. Work characteristics were based on the Karasek model, social support was measured by the Close Persons Questionnaire, depression by the General Health Questionnaire and well-being by the Affect Balance Scale. Despite a small contribution from social selective factors measured by upward mobility, the psychosocial work environment explained most of the cross-sectional socioeconomic status gradient in well-being and depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9448438     DOI: 10.1007/s001270050014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  53 in total

Review 1.  Stress, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and African-American females.

Authors:  Ivor Lensworth Livingston; Jane A Otado; Carmen Warren
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  The demographic and social class basis of inequality in self reported morbidity: an exploration using the Health Survey for England.

Authors:  S Asthana; A Gibson; G Moon; P Brigham; J Dicker
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Anxious? Depressed? You might be suffering from capitalism: contradictory class locations and the prevalence of depression and anxiety in the USA.

Authors:  Seth J Prins; Lisa M Bates; Katherine M Keyes; Carles Muntaner
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-08-03

4.  More than jobs and houses: mental health, quality of life and the perceptions of locality in an area undergoing urban regeneration.

Authors:  Anne Rogers; Peter Huxley; Sherrill Evans; Claire Gately
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Evolutionary psychiatry and depression: testing two hypotheses.

Authors:  Somogy Varga
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-02

6.  Social class and mental health: testing exploitation as a relational determinant of depression.

Authors:  Carles Muntaner; Edwin Ng; Seth J Prins; Katia Bones-Rocha; Albert Espelt; Haejoo Chung
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.663

7.  Are barriers in accessing health services in the Roma population associated with worse health status among Roma?

Authors:  Pavol Jarcuska; Daniela Bobakova; Jan Uhrin; Ladislav Bobak; Ingrid Babinska; Peter Kolarcik; Zuzana Veselska; Andrea Madarasova Geckova
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Do psychosocial work factors and social relations exert independent effects on sickness absence? A six year prospective study of the GAZEL cohort.

Authors:  M Melchior; I Niedhammer; L F Berkman; M Goldberg
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Contribution of working conditions to occupational inequalities in depressive symptoms: results from the national French SUMER survey.

Authors:  Isabelle Niedhammer; Thomas Lesuffleur; Thomas Coutrot; Jean-François Chastang
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Psychosocial stress at work doubles the risk of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged women: evidence from the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  Alexandros Heraclides; Tarani Chandola; Daniel R Witte; Eric J Brunner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.