Literature DB >> 9447689

Spiking and nonspiking models of starburst amacrine cells in the rabbit retina.

T J Velte1, R F Miller.   

Abstract

The integrative properties of starburst amacrine cells in the rabbit retina were studied with compartmental models and computer-stimulation techniques. The anatomical basis for these simulations was provided by computer reconstructions of intracellularly stained starburst amacrine cells and published data on dendritic diameter and biophysical properties. Passive and active membrane properties were included to simulate spiking and nonspiking behavior. Simulated synaptic inputs into one or more compartments consisted of a bipolar-like conductance change with peak and steady-state components provided by the sum of two Gaussian responses. Simulated impulse generation was achieved by using a model of impulse generation that included five nonlinear channels (INa, ICa, IA, IK, IK,Ca). The magnitude of the sodium channel conductance change was altered to meet several different types of impulse generation and propagation behaviors. We studied a range of model constraints which included variations in membrane resistance (Rm) from 4,000 omega.cm2 to 100,000 omega.cm2, and dendritic diameter from 0.1 to 0.3 micron. In a separate series of simulations, we studied the feasibility of voltage-clamping starburst amacrine cells using a soma-applied, single-electrode voltage clamp, based on models with and without dendritic and somatic spiking behavior. Our simulation studies suggest that single dendrites of starburst amacrine cells can behave as independent functional subunits when the Rm is high, provided that one or a small number of dendrites is synaptically co-activated. However, as the number of co-activated dendrites increases, the starburst cell behavior becomes more uniform and independent dendritic function is less prevalent. The presence of impulse activity in the dendrites raises new questions about dendritic function. However, dendritic impulses do not necessarily eliminate independent dendritic function, because dendritic impulses commonly fail as they propagate toward the soma, where they contribute EPSP-like responses which summate with conventional synaptic currents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9447689     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800011780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  8 in total

Review 1.  Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function.

Authors:  David I Vaney; Benjamin Sivyer; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  GABA-mediated spatial and temporal asymmetries that contribute to the directionally selective light responses of starburst amacrine cells in retina.

Authors:  Andrey V Dmitriev; Konstantin E Gavrikov; Stuart C Mangel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  The role of starburst amacrine cells in visual signal processing.

Authors:  W R Taylor; R G Smith
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Cross-compartmental Modulation of Dendritic Signals for Retinal Direction Selectivity.

Authors:  David Koren; James C R Grove; Wei Wei
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Voltage- and calcium-gated ion channels of neurons in the vertebrate retina.

Authors:  Matthew J Van Hook; Scott Nawy; Wallace B Thoreson
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 6.  Stimulus-dependent engagement of neural mechanisms for reliable motion detection in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Qiang Chen; Wei Wei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels contribute to directional responses in starburst amacrine cells.

Authors:  Nicholas W Oesch; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A dendrite-autonomous mechanism for direction selectivity in retinal starburst amacrine cells.

Authors:  Susanne E Hausselt; Thomas Euler; Peter B Detwiler; Winfried Denk
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.