Literature DB >> 9447455

Correlation between salpingoscopic score and subsequent pregnancy outcome in patients with tubal infertility.

T Sawada1, K Tsukada, M Satoh, S Kawakami.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the efficacy of the salpingoscopic scoring system of tubal function.
METHODS: Twenty-seven infertile patients, including 10 patients with proximal tubal occlusion, 12 with endometriosis and 5 with inflammatory hydrosalpinx, were studied. All 54 tubes were examined using a 0.5-mm-diameter salpingoscope and scored.
RESULTS: The mean scores for patients with proximal tubal occlusion, endometriosis, and inflammation were 18.6 +/- 2.0, 15.6 +/- 0.7, and 20.8 +/- 3.4, respectively. Eight patients (29.6%) conceived; their mean tubal score was 12.6 +/- 0.5 (12-16). Nineteen patients did not conceive, and their mean score was 18.8 +/- 1.4 (12-31). There was a significant difference between these two scores (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Scoring of the tubes by salpingoscopic examination is useful for evaluating tubal function with regard to prediction of pregnancy and also for selecting IVF or tubal reconstructive surgery as the preliminary treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9447455      PMCID: PMC3454743          DOI: 10.1023/a:1022572432753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  12 in total

1.  In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery.

Authors:  V Gomel; P J Taylor
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery.

Authors:  G Mage; J L Pouly; J B de Jolinière; S Chabrand; A Riouallon; M A Bruhat
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Adnexal adhesions: a prognostic staging and classification system based on a five-year survey of fertility surgery results at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Authors:  J F Hulka
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-09-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Laparoscopic salpingostomy: fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance.

Authors:  J B Dubuisson; C Chapron; P Morice; F X Aubriot; H Foulot; J Bouquet de Jolinière
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Incidence, prevalence, and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countries.

Authors:  L Weström
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Correlation between salpingoscopic and laparoscopic staging in the assessment of the distal fallopian tube.

Authors:  E S Surrey; M W Surrey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Comparison of ampullary assessment by falloposcopy and salpingoscopy.

Authors:  I W Scudamore; B C Dunphy; M Bowman; J Jenkins; I D Cooke
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Comparison of fallopian tube intraluminal pathology as assessed by salpingoscopy with pelvic adhesions.

Authors:  M C Bowman; I D Cooke
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Salpingoscopy: light microscopic and electron microscopic correlations.

Authors:  A Hershlag; D B Seifer; M L Carcangiu; D L Patton; M P Diamond; A H DeCherney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.