Literature DB >> 9447396

Analysis of screening data: colorectal cancer.

D Gyrd-Hansen1, J Søgaard, O Kronborg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper illustrates how data gathered from an existing screening programme against colorectal cancer can be used to produce new information on the natural history of colorectal cancer as well as the characteristics of the unhydrated Hemoccult II screening test.
METHODS: A mathematical model is used, which on the basis of prevalence and interval incidence data from a randomized screening project initiated in Funen County, Denmark, estimates the sensitivity of the screening test and the sojourn time of the disease.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the Hemoccult is estimated at 62.1% and the mean sojourn time is estimated to be 2.1 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The short sojourn time indicates that overall effectiveness of a Hemoccult II screening programme can be improved significantly by more frequent screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9447396     DOI: 10.1093/ije/26.6.1172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  9 in total

Review 1.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Sidney J Winawer; Michael J O'Brien; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benjamin F Hankey; Weiji Shi; John H Bond; Melvin Schapiro; Joel F Panish; Edward T Stewart; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A novel hypothesis on the sensitivity of the fecal occult blood test: Results of a joint analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Rob Boer; Ann Zauber; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Rob Boer; Janneke Wilschut; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Estimated mean sojourn time associated with hemoccult SENSA for detection of proximal and distal colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wenying Zheng; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Rob Boer; Janneke Wilschut; Sidney J Winawer; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.

Authors:  Grace Hui-Min Wu; Yi-Ming Wang; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Jau-Min Wong; Hsin-Chih Lai; Jane Warwick; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Estimation of screening test (Hemoccult) sensitivity in colorectal cancer mass screening.

Authors:  J L Jouve; L Remontet; V Dancourt; C Lejeune; A M Benhamiche; J Faivre; J Esteve
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Evaluation of a Skin Self-Examination Programme: a Four-Stage Recursive Model

Authors:  David Rowell; Kim Huong Nguyen; Peter Baade; Monika Janda
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.