Literature DB >> 944553

Ultrastructure of rumen bacterial attachment to forage cell walls.

D E Akin.   

Abstract

The degradation of forage cell walls by rumen bacteria was investigated with critical-point drying/scanning electron microscopy and ruthenium red staining/transmission electron microscopy. Differences were observed in the manner of attachment of different morphological types of rumen bacteria to plant cell walls during degradation. Cocci, constituting about 22% of the attached bacteria, appeared to be attached to degraded plant walls via capsule-like substances averaging 58 nm in width (range, 21 to 84 nm). Many bacilli appeared to adhere to forage substrates without distinct capsule-like material, although unattached bacteria with capsules were observed occasionally. Certain bacili appeared to be attached to degraded tissue via small amounts of extracellular material, but others apparently had no extracellular material. Bacilli with a distinct morphology due to an irregularly folded, electron-dense outer layer or layers (about 15 nm thick) and without fibrous extracellular material consituted about 37% of the attached bacteria and were observed to adhere so closely to degraded plant walls that the bacterial shape conformed to the shape of the degraded zone. In the rumen ecosystem, bacteria appeared to adhere to plant substrates during degradation by capsule-like material and by small amounts of extracellular material, as well as by the other means not observable by electron microscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 944553      PMCID: PMC169819          DOI: 10.1128/aem.31.4.562-568.1976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

Review 1.  Structure and function of the cell envelope of gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  J W Costerton; J M Ingram; K J Cheng
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1974-03

2.  Electronmicroscopie observations on the degradation of cellulose fibres by Cellvibrio fulvus and Sporocytophaga myxococcoides.

Authors:  B Berg; B von Hofsten; G Pettersson
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1972-06

3.  Critical-point drying: rapid method for the determination of bacterial extracellular polymer and surface structures.

Authors:  G D Cagle
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-08

4.  Cell envelope morphology of rumen bacteria.

Authors:  J W Costerton; H N Damgaard; K J Cheng
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The ultrastructure of the capsules of Diplococcus pneumoniae and Klebsiella pneumoniae stained with ruthenium red.

Authors:  E L Springer; I L Roth
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-01

6.  Ruthenium red and violet. I. Chemistry, purification, methods of use for electron microscopy and mechanism of action.

Authors:  J H Luft
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1971-11

7.  Ultrastructure of cell envelopes of bacteria of the bovine rumen.

Authors:  K J Cheng; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-06

8.  Improved staining of extracellular polymer for electron microscopy: examination of Azotobacter, Zoogloea, Leuconostoc, and Bacillus.

Authors:  G D Cagle; R M Pfister; G R Vela
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-09

9.  Ultrastructure and adhesion properties of Ruminococcus albus.

Authors:  H Patterson; R Irvin; J W Costerton; K J Cheng
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The fine structure of Chondrococcus columnaris. 3. The surface layers of Chondrococcus columnaris.

Authors:  J L Pate; E J Ordal
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  22 in total

1.  Muramidases found in the foregut microbiome of the Tammar wallaby can direct cell aggregation and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Phillip B Pope; Makrina Totsika; Daniel Aguirre de Carcer; Mark A Schembri; Mark Morrison
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Electron microscopy of the microbial populations present and their modes of attack on various cellulosic substrates undergoing digestion in the sheep rumen.

Authors:  D Dinsdale; E J Morris; J S Bacon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Mode of attack on orchardgrass leaf blades by rumen protozoa.

Authors:  D E Akin; H E Amos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Rumen protozoal degradation of structurally intact forage tissues.

Authors:  H E Amos; D E Akin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Attachment to autoclaved soil of bacterial cells from pure cultures of soil isolates.

Authors:  D L Balkwill; L E Casida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Progression of epiphytic microflora in wheat and alfalfa silages as observed by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  N J Moon; W G Henk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Ruminococcus flavefaciens Cell Coat and Adhesion to Cotton Cellulose and to Cell Walls in Leaves of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne).

Authors:  M J Latham; B E Brooker; G L Pettipher; P J Harris
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effects of Physicochemical Factors on the Adhesion to Cellulose Avicel of the Ruminal Bacteria Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes.

Authors:  V Roger; G Fonty; S Komisarczuk-Bony; P Gouet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Cellodextrin efflux by the cellulolytic ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes and its potential role in the growth of nonadherent bacteria.

Authors:  J E Wells; J B Russell; Y Shi; P J Weimer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Effect of phenolic monomers on ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  W S Borneman; D E Akin; W P VanEseltine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.