Literature DB >> 9445495

Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement.

J A Mason1, K R Herrmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to identify infants with a bilateral, permanent, handicapping hearing loss and to provide them with amplification before age 6 months.
METHODOLOGY: The study population consisted of 10,372 infants born during a 5-year period. Universal hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response was done in the nursery. Infants who failed the screening test were followed up diagnostically. Infants who were not tested in the nursery were followed up as outpatients. Hearing aids were recommended for those infants who had bilateral hearing loss.
RESULTS: Successful screening in the nursery was achieved for 96% of infants. The failure rate was 4%. The incidence of bilateral loss requiring amplification was 1.4/1000. The false-positive rate was 3.5% after the initial screening and .2% when a two-stage screening procedure was used. The incidence of congenital bilateral hearing loss in the well population was 1/1000, and in the neonatal intensive care unit population, 5/1000. The cost of screening was $17 per infant, and the cost to identify each true bilateral hearing loss was $17,750. Amplification was recommended for 15 infants; well infants who used hearing aids before age 6 months achieved age-appropriate speech and language development.
CONCLUSIONS: Mild, moderate, and severe bilateral, persistent hearing loss can be identified in the nursery by automated auditory brainstem response measurement to provide amplification before age 6 months and thus optimize speech and language development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9445495     DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.2.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  41 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

Authors:  C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Genetics of hearing loss: where are we standing now?

Authors:  Hossein Mahboubi; Sami Dwabe; Matthew Fradkin; Virginia Kimonis; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Rescue of Hearing by Gene Delivery to Inner-Ear Hair Cells Using Exosome-Associated AAV.

Authors:  Bence György; Cyrille Sage; Artur A Indzhykulian; Deborah I Scheffer; Alain R Brisson; Sisareuth Tan; Xudong Wu; Adrienn Volak; Dakai Mu; Panos I Tamvakologos; Yaqiao Li; Zachary Fitzpatrick; Maria Ericsson; Xandra O Breakefield; David P Corey; Casey A Maguire
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Costs of different strategies for neonatal hearing screening: a modelling approach.

Authors:  H C Boshuizen; G J van der Lem; M A Kauffman-de Boer; G A van Zanten; A M Oudesluys-Murphy; P H Verkerk
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Neonatal Screening for Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in Rural Areas.

Authors:  Sapna R Parab; Mubarak M Khan; Sneha Kulkarni; Virendra Ghaisas; Prakash Kulkarni
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-05-04

6.  Transcribing the speech of children with cochlear implants: clinical application of narrow phonetic transcriptions.

Authors:  Amy P Teoh; Steven B Chin
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Strategies for genetic study of hearing loss in the Brazilian northeastern region.

Authors:  Uirá S Melo; Silvana Santos; Hannalice G Cavalcanti; Wagner T Andrade; Vitor G Dantas; Marine Rd Rosa; Regina C Mingroni-Netto
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2014-02-17

8.  Auditory evoked potentials of the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus): implications for directional hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Ruiyu Zeng; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Can a patient-tracking system effectively be organized using modern information technology and central data management?

Authors:  W Delb; D Merkel; K Pilorget; J Schmitt; P K Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Economic evaluation of newborn hearing screening: modelling costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Franz Hessel; Eva Grill; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Uwe Siebert; Silke Kunze; Andreas Nickisch; Hubertus von Voss; Jürgen Wasem
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2003-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.