Literature DB >> 9445327

Carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries: a statewide evaluation of appropriateness and outcome.

H R Karp1, W D Flanders, C C Shipp, B Taylor, D Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: We sought to examine the appropriateness and the surgical outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CE) in unselected community hospitals to identify opportunities for improvement.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all CEs performed on Medicare beneficiaries in Georgia in 1993 (n = 1945). Conclusions regarding appropriateness were based on current guidelines as interpreted by a physician reviewer and were supported by the aggregate results of structured, blinded overreading by clinicians with relevant expertise. Adverse outcomes were confirmed and rated as to severity by a physician. Outcomes were correlated with demography, vascular anatomic findings, comorbidity, surgical techniques, and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: The majority of the patients (51%) were asymptomatic at presentation. CEs were performed appropriately in 96.1% of the cases in accordance with current guidelines. There was no significant difference in the rate of appropriateness between the symptomatic (96%) and the asymptomatic patients (96.4%). Survival without stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) was 94.3%. The 30-day mortality was 1.9%; moderate to severe strokes occurred in 1.8%, stroke-related death in 0.7%, MI in 1.1%, and MI-related death in 0.5%. Those hospitals performing <10 CEs in the observed year had a statistically significant higher morbidity and mortality as well as an increase in less severe complications such as hematomas, wound dehiscence, wound infection, and pneumonia than did hospitals with higher volume of CEs.. Older patients and women had statistically significantly higher morbidity and mortality. Patients with a Charlson Severity Index score of > or =1 had a risk for adverse outcomes 3.4 times higher than patients with a score of 0 after adjustment for age and sex.
CONCLUSIONS: The great majority of CEs performed in Georgia on Medicare patients were appropriate, according to current guidelines. Slightly more than half of the patients were asymptomatic as defined in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. In hospitals performing <CEs in the index year, we noted higher morbidity and mortality, as well as an increase in less severe complications. This relationship between the volume of surgery and outcome was confirmed in the analysis of the 30-day mortality for all Medicare cases (n = 10,569) performed in Georgia from 1991 to 1995. This was the most important opportunity for improvement identified in this study. In view of the increased use of CE, it is important to continue to monitor the patterns of practice for this procedure to improve outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9445327     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.29.1.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  8 in total

1.  Current outcomes of simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in North America.

Authors:  Sunil M Prasad; Shuang Li; J Scott Rankin; Sean M O'Brien; James S Gammie; John D Puskas; David M Shahian; Edgar G Chedrawy; Malek G Massad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Henry J M Barnett; Heather E Meldrum; Michael Eliasziw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Common Reasons That Asymptomatic Patients Who Are 65 Years and Older Receive Carotid Imaging.

Authors:  Salomeh Keyhani; Eric M Cheng; Ayman Naseri; Ethan A Halm; Linda S Williams; Jason Johanning; Erin Madden; Soraya Rofagha; Alexandra Woodbridge; Ann Abraham; Rosa Ahn; Susan Saba; Elnaz Eilkhani; Paul Hebert; Dawn M Bravata
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting.

Authors:  F Nahab; M J Lynn; S E Kasner; M J Alexander; R Klucznik; O O Zaidat; J Chaloupka; H Lutsep; S Barnwell; M Mawad; B Lane; M I Chimowitz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Salomeh Keyhani; Eric M Cheng; Katherine J Hoggatt; Peter C Austin; Erin Madden; Paul L Hebert; Ethan A Halm; Ayman Naseri; Jason M Johanning; Danielle Mowery; Wendy W Chapman; Dawn M Bravata
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 18.302

6.  High Operator and Hospital Volume Are Associated With a Decreased Risk of Death and Stroke After Carotid Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Eelco C Brand; Alison Halliday; Richard Bulbulia; Michiel L Bots; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  An audit tool for assessing the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  James Kennedy; Hude Quan; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Meta- analysis and meta-regression analysis of the associations between sex and the operative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Luebke; Jan Brunkwall
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.