OBJECTIVE: Outcome studies support the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral approaches for treating depression among adults. The effectiveness of these approaches for adolescents, however, has received less empirical attention. This article critically reviews the literature on cognitive-behavioral therapy with depressed and dysphoric adolescents. METHOD: A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of these approaches and the stability of therapeutic gains. RESULTS: Fourteen posttreatment-control comparisons and 10 follow-up-control comparisons resulted from six studies containing 217 subjects. The overall effect size posttreatment was -1.02, whereas the overall effect size at follow-up was -0.61. The effect sizes in both of these analyses were homogeneous and were supported by Fail-Safe-N calculations. CONCLUSION: Results suggest the short- and long-term effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral approaches for treating depressive symptoms with this population.
OBJECTIVE: Outcome studies support the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral approaches for treating depression among adults. The effectiveness of these approaches for adolescents, however, has received less empirical attention. This article critically reviews the literature on cognitive-behavioral therapy with depressed and dysphoric adolescents. METHOD: A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of these approaches and the stability of therapeutic gains. RESULTS: Fourteen posttreatment-control comparisons and 10 follow-up-control comparisons resulted from six studies containing 217 subjects. The overall effect size posttreatment was -1.02, whereas the overall effect size at follow-up was -0.61. The effect sizes in both of these analyses were homogeneous and were supported by Fail-Safe-N calculations. CONCLUSION: Results suggest the short- and long-term effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral approaches for treating depressive symptoms with this population.
Authors: Brian Mustanski; Michelle Birkett; George J Greene; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Michael E Newcomb Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308