Literature DB >> 9444720

What do patients want and not want to see about themselves on the computer screen: a qualitative study.

L Ridsdale1, S Hudd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' views about what they would or would not like to read on the computer screen, and how this might be managed.
DESIGN: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with patients who had recently consulted, and who were representative of the age-sex structure of our practice population.
SETTING: Primary health care, patients' homes. PATIENTS: 30 patients aged 18-89 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were likely to state that information about lifestyle (e.g. smoking and drinking) might be helpful to read on condition that it had been provided by the patients themselves, and not by a third party. Most patients would not want to read personal comments. Nearly half of the patients expressed concern about seeing a serious illness on the screen, especially if it had not been fully discussed in advance. Over a third were concerned about seeing a mental illness listed. They suggested that these labels were subjective, confusing, and likely to be rejected by patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Doctors need to develop and evaluate ways by which patients gain access to reading about their problems on desk-top computers, and devise strategies whereby this can be integrated constructively with information exchange in the consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9444720     DOI: 10.3109/02813439709035024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  12 in total

1.  Clictate: a computer-based documentation tool for guideline-based care.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; John Cowan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Computer use must not affect doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  A Thornett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

3.  Computer support for recording and interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care (RAGs): qualitative evaluation with simulated patients.

Authors:  J Emery; R Walton; A Coulson; D Glasspool; S Ziebland; J Fox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-03

4.  An evaluation of patient access to their electronic medical records via the World Wide Web.

Authors:  J J Cimino; J Li; E A Mendonça; S Sengupta; V L Patel; A W Kushniruk
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

Review 5.  The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review.

Authors:  Stephen E Ross; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework.

Authors:  Warren J Winkelman; Kevin J Leonard
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences.

Authors:  Mark A Earnest; Stephen E Ross; Loretta Wittevrongel; Laurie A Moore; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  The nature of informational continuity of care in general practice.

Authors:  Gina Agarwal; Valorie A Crooks
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 9.  What are the roles involved in establishing and maintaining informational continuity of care within family practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Valorie A Crooks; Gina Agarwal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  The feasibility of using pattern recognition software to measure the influence of computer use on the consultation.

Authors:  Simon de Lusignan; Eben Wilson; Andy Dyble; Tristan Grant; Alice Theadom; Tom Chan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.