Literature DB >> 9444543

Treatment of depression in the elderly: effect of physical illness on response.

M Evans1, M Hammond, K Wilson, M Lye, J Copeland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the response to treatment of different subgroups within a sample of physically ill elderly depressed patients.
DESIGN: Acute geriatric medical inpatients with depression, randomly assigned to an 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Response rate as defined by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
RESULTS: Data were analysed in subgroups according to diagnosed physical problems and concomitant medication. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify subgroups valid for separate analysis. Those reaching at least 5 weeks of treatment showed a significant improvement compared with the placebo group if they had serious life-threatening disease, cerebrovascular disease, were not demented, or were either on no analgesics or on analgesics stronger than paracetamol.
CONCLUSION: While the response to treatment in these subgroups was encouraging, general physicians must not be led to believe that the answer to depression lies only in pharmacological intervention, just as the belief that the risk-benefit ratio of such treatment where indicated is too high must be discouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9444543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0885-6230            Impact factor:   3.485


  8 in total

Review 1.  Use of antidepressants in late-life depression.

Authors:  Tarek K Rajji; Benoit H Mulsant; Francis E Lotrich; Cynthia Lokker; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Antidepressant versus placebo for depressed elderly.

Authors:  K Wilson; P Mottram; A Sivanranthan; A Nightingale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for late-life depression: a comparative review.

Authors:  L K Solai; B H Mulsant; B G Pollock
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Impact of medical comorbid disease on antidepressant treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Dan V Iosifescu; Bettina Bankier; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Medical and substance use comorbidity in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  David E Kemp; Keming Gao; Stephen J Ganocy; Emily Caldes; Kathryn Feldman; Philip K Chan; Carla Conroy; Sarah Bilali; Robert L Findling; Joseph R Calabrese
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 6.  The pharmacological management of depression.

Authors:  David J Kupfer
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.986

7.  Pharmacological, psychological, and non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for treating depression after stroke.

Authors:  Sabine Allida; Katherine Laura Cox; Cheng-Fang Hsieh; Helen Lang; Allan House; Maree L Hackett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-28

8.  The safety and tolerability of duloxetine in depressed elderly patients with and without medical comorbidity.

Authors:  T N Wise; C G Wiltse; D V Iosifescu; M Sheridan; J Y Xu; J Raskin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.