Literature DB >> 9443981

Repair of degraded duplex DNA from prehistoric samples using Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and T4 DNA ligase.

C M Pusch1, I Giddings, M Scholz.   

Abstract

The most notable feature of DNA extracted from prehistoric material is that it is of poor quality. Amplification of PCR products from such DNA is consequently an exception. Here we present a simple method for the repair of degraded duplex DNA using the enzymes Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and T4 DNA ligase. Adjacent sequences separated by nicks do not split up into intact strands during the denaturation step of PCR. Thus the target DNA is refractory to amplification. The proposed repair of nicked, fragmented ancient DNA results in an increase of amplification efficiency, such that the correct base order of the respective nuclear DNA segment can be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9443981      PMCID: PMC147318          DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.3.857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ancient DNA and the polymerase chain reaction. The emerging field of molecular archaeology.

Authors:  S Pääbo; R G Higuchi; A C Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Isolation and characterization of DNA from archaeological bone.

Authors:  E Hagelberg; J B Clegg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1991-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR.

Authors:  P Taberlet; S Griffin; B Goossens; S Questiau; V Manceau; N Escaravage; L P Waits; J Bouvet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A simple and fast procedure for high quality DNA isolation from gels using laundry detergent and inverted columns.

Authors:  C Pusch
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification.

Authors:  S Pääbo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Isopropanol precipitation removes PCR inhibitors from ancient bone extracts.

Authors:  C Hänni; T Brousseau; V Laudet; D Stehelin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans.

Authors:  M Krings; A Stone; R W Schmitz; H Krainitzki; M Stoneking; S Pääbo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-07-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  DNA damage and DNA sequence retrieval from ancient tissues.

Authors:  M Höss; P Jaruga; T H Zastawny; M Dizdaroglu; S Pääbo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  A simple and efficient method for PCR amplifiable DNA extraction from ancient bones.

Authors:  T Kalmár; C Z Bachrati; A Marcsik; I Raskó
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Enzymatic repair of selected cross-linked homoduplex molecules enhances nuclear gene rescue from Pompeii and Herculaneum remains.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Bernardo; Stefania Del Gaudio; Marcella Cammarota; Umberto Galderisi; Antonino Cascino; Marilena Cipollaro
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Distribution patterns of postmortem damage in human mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  M Thomas P Gilbert; Eske Willerslev; Anders J Hansen; Ian Barnes; Lars Rudbeck; Niels Lynnerup; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Crosslinks rather than strand breaks determine access to ancient DNA sequences from frozen sediments.

Authors:  Anders J Hansen; David L Mitchell; Carsten Wiuf; Lakshmi Paniker; Tina B Brand; Jonas Binladen; David A Gilichinsky; Regin Rønn; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  DNA repair enables sex identification in genetic material from human teeth.

Authors:  L Kovatsi; D Nikou; S Triantaphyllou; S N Njau; S Voutsaki; S Kouidou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Genomic differentiation of Neanderthals and anatomically modern man allows a fossil-DNA-based classification of morphologically indistinguishable hominid bones.

Authors:  M Scholz; L Bachmann; G J Nicholson; J Bachmann; I Giddings; B Rüschoff-Thale; A Czarnetzki; C M Pusch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-27       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Comparison of different methods for repairing damaged DNA from buffered and unbuffered formalin-fixed tissues.

Authors:  Yuxuan Liu; Huayu He; Shaohua Yi; Qingqing Hu; Wenqiong Zhang; Daixin Huang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Cats of the Pharaohs: Genetic Comparison of Egyptian Cat Mummies to their Feline Contemporaries.

Authors:  Jennifer D Kurushima; Salima Ikram; Joan Knudsen; Edward Bleiberg; Robert A Grahn; Leslie A Lyons
Journal:  J Archaeol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Road blocks on paleogenomes--polymerase extension profiling reveals the frequency of blocking lesions in ancient DNA.

Authors:  Patricia Heyn; Udo Stenzel; Adrian W Briggs; Martin Kircher; Michael Hofreiter; Matthias Meyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Preamplification procedure for the analysis of ancient DNA samples.

Authors:  Stefania Del Gaudio; Alessandra Cirillo; Giovanni Di Bernardo; Umberto Galderisi; Theodoros Thanassoulas; Theodoros Pitsios; Marilena Cipollaro
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.