BACKGROUND: Olfactory deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) have been well established. OBJECTIVE: To clarify and review the literature by evaluating the evidence for olfactory deficits in 3 olfactory domains, including odor identification, recognition, and detection threshold. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of English-language studies of olfaction in AD, PD, and healthy controls was conducted via online databases (PsycInfo and MEDLINE) and reference lists from review articles. STUDY SELECTION: To meet selection criteria for meta-analysis, each study required a control group and complete and usable data. This review yielded 26 publications of olfactory identification, recognition, and/or detection threshold. Because of the inclusion of more than 1 relevant study of olfaction in several of these publications (eg, both identification and threshold assessed), 43 studies were ultimately appropriate for meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Effect sizes were calculated for each study by expressing differences between patient and control group means in SD units (Cohen's d). DATA SYNTHESIS: Extremely large effect sizes were shown across all tasks in both AD and PD groups. Both between-group analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test and within-group analyses using Friedman 2-way analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences (all P > .30). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, severe deficits were found for both patients with AD and PD in each of the 3 olfactory domains relative to controls. However, no discriminating olfactory deficits were seen between patient groups or among the 3 measured olfactory domains, suggesting a similar disturbance in olfactory function between patients with AD and PD.
BACKGROUND:Olfactory deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) have been well established. OBJECTIVE: To clarify and review the literature by evaluating the evidence for olfactory deficits in 3 olfactory domains, including odor identification, recognition, and detection threshold. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of English-language studies of olfaction in AD, PD, and healthy controls was conducted via online databases (PsycInfo and MEDLINE) and reference lists from review articles. STUDY SELECTION: To meet selection criteria for meta-analysis, each study required a control group and complete and usable data. This review yielded 26 publications of olfactory identification, recognition, and/or detection threshold. Because of the inclusion of more than 1 relevant study of olfaction in several of these publications (eg, both identification and threshold assessed), 43 studies were ultimately appropriate for meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Effect sizes were calculated for each study by expressing differences between patient and control group means in SD units (Cohen's d). DATA SYNTHESIS: Extremely large effect sizes were shown across all tasks in both AD and PD groups. Both between-group analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test and within-group analyses using Friedman 2-way analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences (all P > .30). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, severe deficits were found for both patients with AD and PD in each of the 3 olfactory domains relative to controls. However, no discriminating olfactory deficits were seen between patient groups or among the 3 measured olfactory domains, suggesting a similar disturbance in olfactory function between patients with AD and PD.
Authors: Daniel W Wesson; Anne H Borkowski; Gary E Landreth; Ralph A Nixon; Efrat Levy; Donald A Wilson Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Steven E Arnold; Edward B Lee; Paul J Moberg; Lauren Stutzbach; Hala Kazi; Li-Ying Han; Virginia M Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Brittany N Dugger; Michael Malek-Ahmadi; Sarah E Monsell; Walter A Kukull; Bryan K Woodruff; Eric M Reiman; Thomas G Beach; Jeffrey Wilson Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2016 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703