BACKGROUND: Edatrexate and carboplatin are each active single agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical studies in NSCLC lines have demonstrated schedule-dependent synergy of edatrexate followed by carboplatin. In a phase I trial, we demonstrated the tolerability of this combination, the ability of ice-chip cryotherapy to ameliorate dose-limiting mucositis, and promising activity in NSCLC. This phase II trial (SWOG 9207) was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in stage IV NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 24 patients with stage IV disease were accrued to this Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) multicenter study. Treatment consisted of edatrexate 80 mg/m2 (50% dose on day 8) intravenously weekly for 5 weeks, then every other week, and carboplatin 350 mg/m2 every 28 days. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 23 were assessable for toxicity and response; one was ineligible for study entry. Myelosuppression was the most significant toxicity; grade 3-4 neutropenia was seen in 8/23 patients. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis during the first cycle of therapy, in both instances associated with the presence of pleural effusions. Although mild mucositis was common, it was dose-limiting (grade 3) in only three patients. Objective response was observed in 3/23 patients (13%). The median survival time was 7 months, and 30% of patients remained alive at one year. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ice-chip cryotherapy is effective in reducing the severity of mucositis typically associated with this edatrexate schedule of administration. However, unexpectedly severe myelosuppression resulted in death from neutropenic sepsis in two patients with third space fluid collections, leading to a protocol amendment to exclude such patients from study entry. Furthermore, response and median survival with this dose schedule of edatrexate and carboplatin do not appear to be improved compared to other chemotherapeutic regimens tested by SWOG in this patient population.
BACKGROUND:Edatrexate and carboplatin are each active single agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical studies in NSCLC lines have demonstrated schedule-dependent synergy of edatrexate followed by carboplatin. In a phase I trial, we demonstrated the tolerability of this combination, the ability of ice-chip cryotherapy to ameliorate dose-limiting mucositis, and promising activity in NSCLC. This phase II trial (SWOG 9207) was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in stage IV NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 24 patients with stage IV disease were accrued to this Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) multicenter study. Treatment consisted of edatrexate 80 mg/m2 (50% dose on day 8) intravenously weekly for 5 weeks, then every other week, and carboplatin 350 mg/m2 every 28 days. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 23 were assessable for toxicity and response; one was ineligible for study entry. Myelosuppression was the most significant toxicity; grade 3-4 neutropenia was seen in 8/23 patients. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis during the first cycle of therapy, in both instances associated with the presence of pleural effusions. Although mild mucositis was common, it was dose-limiting (grade 3) in only three patients. Objective response was observed in 3/23 patients (13%). The median survival time was 7 months, and 30% of patients remained alive at one year. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ice-chip cryotherapy is effective in reducing the severity of mucositis typically associated with this edatrexate schedule of administration. However, unexpectedly severe myelosuppression resulted in death from neutropenic sepsis in two patients with third space fluid collections, leading to a protocol amendment to exclude such patients from study entry. Furthermore, response and median survival with this dose schedule of edatrexate and carboplatin do not appear to be improved compared to other chemotherapeutic regimens tested by SWOG in this patient population.
Authors: Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-04-13
Authors: Karen D Wright; John C Panetta; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Wilburn E Reddick; Zoltan Patay; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Alberto Broniscer; Giles Robinson; Frederick A Boop; Paul Klimo; Deborah Ward; Amar Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Douglas E Peterson; Kerstin Ohrn; Joanne Bowen; Monica Fliedner; Judith Lees; Charles Loprinzi; Takehiko Mori; Anthony Osaguona; Dianna S Weikel; Sharon Elad; Rajesh V Lalla Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Axel Grothey; Alex A Adjei; Steve R Alberts; Edith A Perez; Kurt A Jaeckle; Charles L Loprinzi; Daniel J Sargent; Jeff A Sloan; Jan C Buckner Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: M Elvira P Correa; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Karen Chiang; Abhishek Kandwal; Charles L Loprinzi; Takehiko Mori; Carin Potting; Tanya Rouleau; Juan J Toro; Vinisha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Douglas E Peterson; Paolo Bossi; Rajesh V Lalla; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-12-14 Impact factor: 3.603