Literature DB >> 9443468

Decreased cerebellar posterior vermis size in fragile X syndrome: correlation with neurocognitive performance.

S H Mostofsky1, M M Mazzocco, G Aakalu, I S Warsofsky, M B Denckla, A L Reiss.   

Abstract

We examined whether posterior vermis size is smaller in individuals with fragile X syndrome (fra X) than in control subjects and whether this decreased size is associated with cognitive performance. Cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions have been identified in fra X; however, underlying neuropathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. MRI was used to investigate the posterior fossa in 32 males with fra X, 28 males with other causes of cognitive disability (CD), and 38 males with normal development (ND) as well as and in 37 females with fra X and 53 female control subjects. Among females with fra X, neurocognitive correlates of posterior vermis size were examined. Posterior vermis size (cross-sectional area) in males with fra X was significantly smaller compared with CD and ND groups, particularly when corrected for intracranial area. Posterior vermis size corrected for intracranial area was significantly smaller in females with fra X compared with control subjects. Compared with males with fra X and non-fra X control subjects, posterior vermis size in females with fra X was intermediate. After statistically removing the effect of mean parental IQ, posterior vermis size predicted a significant proportion of the variance (10 to 23%) of performance on full-scale, verbal, and performance IQ; block design; categories achieved on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; and the Rey inventory score. The size of the posterior vermis is significantly decreased in fra X, more so in males than in females. In females with fra X, posterior vermis size predicts performance on selected cognitive measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9443468     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.50.1.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  53 in total

1.  Discrimination learning and attentional set formation in a mouse model of Fragile X.

Authors:  Kimberly S Casten; Annette C Gray; Rebecca D Burwell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Fragile X: leading the way for targeted treatments in autism.

Authors:  Lulu W Wang; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Moving Toward Integrative, Multidimensional Research in Modern Psychiatry: Lessons Learned From Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Lawrence K Fung; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Comprehensive motor testing in Fmr1-KO mice exposes temporal defects in oromotor coordination.

Authors:  Snigdha Roy; Yu Zhao; Melody Allensworth; Mohamed F Farook; Mark S LeDoux; Lawrence T Reiter; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Cerebellar vermis morphology in children with spina bifida and Chiari type II malformation.

Authors:  Michael S Salman; Susan E Blaser; James A Sharpe; Maureen Dennis
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Cerebellar disorders in childhood: cognitive problems.

Authors:  Maja Steinlin
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  Insights into brain development from neurogenetic syndromes: evidence from fragile X syndrome, Williams syndrome, Turner syndrome and velocardiofacial syndrome.

Authors:  E Walter; P K Mazaika; A L Reiss
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Neuroanatomical abnormalities in fragile X syndrome during the adolescent and young adult years.

Authors:  Gisela M Sandoval; Sehoon Shim; David S Hong; Amy S Garrett; Eve-Marie Quintin; Matthew J Marzelli; Swetapadma Patnaik; Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Eye movements reveal impaired inhibitory control in adult male fragile X premutation carriers asymptomatic for FXTAS.

Authors:  Ling M Wong; Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Yingratana McLennan; Flora Tassone; Melody Zhang; Susan M Rivera; Tony J Simon
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Gene, brain, and behavior relationships in fragile X syndrome: evidence from neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.