Literature DB >> 9442833

Development and clinical evaluation of a second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox 2), designed for anterograde and retrograde insertion.

F J Hilgers1, A H Ackerstaff, A J Balm, I B Tan, N K Aaronson, J O Persson.   

Abstract

Prosthetic voice restoration has considerably improved the results of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy, and is presently the method of choice for many health-care providers treating laryngectomized patients. The Provox voice prosthesis, developed in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, is an indwelling device that has been applied in recent years with regular success. Its retrograde replacement method, using a disposable guide wire, assures reliable, atraumatic positioning of the prosthesis in the tracheoesophageal fistula. However, the method sometimes may be uncomfortable for the patient; therefore an adapted prosthesis and new replacement equipment were developed, which enable bidirectional insertion, i.e. not only in the traditional retrograde manner through the pharynx, but especially in an anterograde manner through the stoma. This second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox 2) was studied in a prospective clinical trial in 44 patients (33 experienced patients, seven first-time replacements and four primary insertions). The study demonstrated that the anterograde insertion with the Provox 2 system was applicable in all patients, making the voice prosthesis even easier to handle than with the traditional retrograde method. A stenosis of the pharyngoesophageal segment no longer interfered with the replacement. In addition, the patients judged the new method as being favourable, reporting significantly less discomfort during the replacement procedure (paired Student's t-test: p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the adapted voice prosthesis could be removed from the tracheoesophageal fistula without excessive force (mean 7.9 N, range 6.0-14.0 N), more easily than the original Provox (mean 20.9 N, range 5.5-25.0 N). It can be concluded that this second-generation indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox 2) seems to be a further improvement in the application of this voice rehabilitation system, not only simplifying the replacement procedure, but also diminishing the discomfort for the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9442833     DOI: 10.3109/00016489709114220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  15 in total

1.  Microbial colonization of tracheoesophageal voice prostheses (Provox2) following total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Brigita Tićac; Robert Tićac; Tomislav Rukavina; Palmira Gregorović Kesovija; Dijana Pedisić; Boris Maljevac; Radan Starcević
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The development and treatment of periprosthetic leakage after prosthetic voice restoration. A literature review and personal experience part I: the development of periprosthetic leakage.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Initial clinical experience with the Provox-Vega® voice prosthesis and the SmartInserter® system].

Authors:  K J Lorenz; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: A chronological review of medical history].

Authors:  K J Lorenz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [A novel puncture instrument: the Provox-Vega® puncture set. Its use in voice prosthesis insertion following laryngectomy].

Authors:  K J Lorenz; F M Hilgers; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation: state of the art at the millennium.

Authors:  Dale H Brown; Frans J M Hilgers; Jonathan C Irish; Alfons J M Balm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Disease control and clinicopathological prognostic factors of total pharyngolaryngectomy for hypopharyngeal cancer: a single-center study.

Authors:  Go Omura; Mizuo Ando; Yuki Saito; Kenya Kobayashi; Tatsuya Yamasoba; Takahiro Asakage
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Physiology and prospects of bimanual tracheoesophageal brass instrument play.

Authors:  F J M Hilgers; R Dirven; I Jacobi; M W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Provox voice prosthesis - The Indian experience.

Authors:  U K Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-01

10.  Development and (pre-) clinical assessment of a novel surgical tool for primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture with immediate voice prosthesis insertion, the Provox Vega Puncture Set.

Authors:  Frans J M Hilgers; Kai J Lorenz; Heinz Maier; Cees A Meeuwis; Jeroen D F Kerrebijn; Vincent Vander Poorten; Anne Sophie Vinck; Miquel Quer; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.