Literature DB >> 9441776

The significance of peritoneal cytology in uterine cervix and endometrial cancer.

M Kashimura1, K Sugihara, N Toki, Y Matsuura, T Kawagoe, T Kamura, T Kaku, N Tsuruchi, H Nakashima, H Sakai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology and to elucidate the prognostic value of peritoneal cytology in patients with uterine cervix and endometrial cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incidence of positive peritoneal cytology was investigated in 642 patients including 339 uterine cervix and 303 endometrial cancers. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method in a subgroup of 116 stage II cervix and 199 stage I endometrial cancers, and multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model was used to identify an independent prognostic factor.
RESULTS: The incidence of positive peritoneal cytology was found to be 9% in uterine cervix cancer and 15% in endometrial cancer. The incidence was higher in patients with some clinicopathologic status such as advanced stage, lymph node metastasis, ovarian metastasis, and deeper myometrial invasion. The 5-year survival rate for patients with positive or negative peritoneal cytology was 44 or 80% in stage II cervix cancers and 80 or 92% in clinical stage I endometrial cancers, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent prognostic determinants were pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis and peritoneal cytology in stage II cervix cancer and peritoneal cytology in stage I endometrial cancer. Proper treatment protocol should be scheduled for patients with positive peritoneal cytology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9441776     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Histologic grade and peritoneal cytology as prognostic factors in type 1 endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kei Tanaka; Yoichi Kobayashi; Juri Sugiyama; Tatsuo Yamazaki; Kei Dozono; Momoe Watanabe; Hiromi Shibuya; Yoshiko Nishigaya; Mai Momomura; Hironori Matsumoto; Satoshi Umezawa; Kiyoshi Takamatsu; Mitsutoshi Iwashita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Establishment of red fluorescent protein-tagged HeLa tumor metastasis models: determination of DsRed2 insertion effects and comparison of metastatic patterns after subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or intravenous injection.

Authors:  Jau-Yeong Lu; Hui-Chun Chen; Ricky Yuan-Yuan Chu; Tsu-Chun Emma Lin; Ping-I Hsu; Ming-Shyan Huang; Ching-Jiunn Tseng; Michael Hsiao
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Positive peritoneal cytology is an independent risk-factor in early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; Feng Gao; Jason D Wright; Andrea R Hagemann; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial carcinoma confined to the uterus.

Authors:  T Kasamatsu; T Onda; N Katsumata; M Sawada; T Yamada; R Tsunematsu; K Ohmi; Y Sasajima; Y Matsuno
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  The relationship between positive peritoneal cytology and the prognosis of patients with FIGO stage I/II uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shiho Kuji; Yasuyuki Hirashima; Satomi Komeda; Aki Tanaka; Masakazu Abe; Nobutaka Takahashi; Munetaka Takekuma
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  The impact of positive peritoneal cytology on prognosis in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Hee Yoon; Soo-Nyung Kim; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Ji-Young Lee; Sun-Joo Lee; In-Kyeong Oh; Hyeon-Jeong Kim; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Revaluating the survival effects of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1988 stage IIIA criteria for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Osman Türkmen; Alper Karalok; Derman Başaran; Günsu Kimyon; Gizem Kul; Gökhan Tulunay; Işın Üreyen; Taner Turan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Diaphragmatic smears are not of additional benefit in the detection of peritoneal spread in gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Celine Montavon; Uzma Mirza; Andre Fedier; Andreas Schoetzau; Rosanna Zanetti Dällenbach; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Risk of spilling cancer cells during total laparoscopic hysterectomy in low-risk endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Shinohara; Ikuko Sakamoto; Masahiro Numata; Atsushi Ikegami; Katsuhiro Teramoto
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2016-12-31

Review 10.  Role of uterine manipulator during laparoscopic endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Andrea Rosati; Stefano Uccella; Gaetano Riemma; Mattia Tarascio; Marco Torella; Pasquale De Franciscis; Nicola Colacurci; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.