Literature DB >> 9441569

Effectiveness of computer-generated reminders for increasing discussions about advance directives and completion of advance directive forms. A randomized, controlled trial.

P R Dexter, F D Wolinsky, G P Gramelspacher, X H Zhou, G J Eckert, M Waisburd, W M Tierney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians can increase the rate of completion of advance directive forms by discussing directives with their patients, but the means by which physicians can be induced to initiate these discussions are unclear. Computer-generated reminders have been shown to increase physician compliance with practice guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of computer-generated reminders to physicians on the frequency of advance directive discussions between patients and their primary caregivers and the frequency of consequent establishment of advance directives.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design.
SETTING: An outpatient general medicine practice associated with an urban public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 1) 1009 patients who were at least 75 years of age or were at least 50 years of age with serious underlying disease and 2) 147 primary care physicians (108 housestaff and 39 faculty). INTERVENTION: Computer-generated reminders that recommended discussion of one or both of two types of advance directives compared with no reminders. MEASUREMENTS: Discussions about advance directives, determined by patient interviews after all scheduled patient-physician outpatient encounters, and completed advance directive forms. The study period was approximately 1 year.
RESULTS: Physicians who did not receive reminders (controls) discussed advance directives with 4% of the study patients compared with 24% for physicians who received both types of reminders (adjusted odds ratio, 7.7 [95% CI, 3.4 to 18]; P < 0.001). Physicians who did not receive reminders completed advance directive forms with only 4% of their study patients compared with 15% for physicians who received both types of reminders (adjusted odds ratio, 7.0 [CI, 2.9 to 17]; P < 0.001). Overall, 45% of patients with whom advance directives were discussed completed at least one type of advance directive.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple computer-generated reminders aimed at primary caregivers can increase the rates of discussion of advance directives and completion of advance directive forms among elderly outpatients with serious illnesses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9441569     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-2-199801150-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  46 in total

1.  A design model for computer-based guideline implementation based on information management services.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; C A Brandt; Y Liaw; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Authors:  J H Chuang; G Hripcsak; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

4.  Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Chuang; George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Authors:  J Michael Fitzmaurice; Karen Adams; John M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Liam Smeeth; Richard Ashcroft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B J Edwards; A D Bunta; J Anderson; A Bobb; A Hahr; K J O'Leary; A Agulnek; L Andruszyn; K A Cameron; M May; N H Kazmers; N Dillon; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care.

Authors:  Timothy R Dresselhaus; John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Dan Bertenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Adaptive designs for randomized trials in public health.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Thomas R Ten Have; Booil Jo; Getachew Dagne; Peter A Wyman; Bengt Muthén; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 21.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.