PURPOSE: In the present study we intended to validate knee joint cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MRI. METHODS: Ten fresh cadaver knees (age 29 to 64 yrs.) were sagittally imaged, using a fat-suppressed FLASH-3D sequence with a resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm3. Then, a contrast agent was injected and the specimens submitted to CT arthrography. From both modalities the patellar, femoral, and tibial cartilages were segmented semiautomatically and reconstructed three-dimensionally. The cartilage thickness was determined independently of the sectional plane, based on a "minimal distance algorithm". RESULTS: The volumes and the regional distribution patterns yielded a very high degree of similarity on direct comparison of both imaging modalities. The average volume error between MRI and CT was 3.8% (+/- 3.0%), the correlation 0.998, the slope of the regression line 1.04 and the gamma-intercept -80 mm3. The analysis yielded no significant differences between the two methods (Wilcoxon signed rank test, 5% level) in the patella, femur, medial, and lateral tibia. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, based on a fat-suppressed FLASH sequence with high resolution and three-dimensional concepts of digital image analysis, the cartilage volume and thickness can be analysed non-invasively and with high accuracy by MRI.
PURPOSE: In the present study we intended to validate knee joint cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MRI. METHODS: Ten fresh cadaver knees (age 29 to 64 yrs.) were sagittally imaged, using a fat-suppressed FLASH-3D sequence with a resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm3. Then, a contrast agent was injected and the specimens submitted to CT arthrography. From both modalities the patellar, femoral, and tibial cartilages were segmented semiautomatically and reconstructed three-dimensionally. The cartilage thickness was determined independently of the sectional plane, based on a "minimal distance algorithm". RESULTS: The volumes and the regional distribution patterns yielded a very high degree of similarity on direct comparison of both imaging modalities. The average volume error between MRI and CT was 3.8% (+/- 3.0%), the correlation 0.998, the slope of the regression line 1.04 and the gamma-intercept -80 mm3. The analysis yielded no significant differences between the two methods (Wilcoxon signed rank test, 5% level) in the patella, femur, medial, and lateral tibia. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, based on a fat-suppressed FLASH sequence with high resolution and three-dimensional concepts of digital image analysis, the cartilage volume and thickness can be analysed non-invasively and with high accuracy by MRI.
Authors: Alex de Crespigny; Hani Bou-Reslan; Merry C Nishimura; Heidi Phillips; Richard A D Carano; Helen E D'Arceuil Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 2.390