Literature DB >> 9440845

Characteristics of metals used in implants.

I Gotman1.   

Abstract

The performance of any material in the human body is controlled by two sets of characteristics: biofunctionality and biocompatibility. With the wide range of materials available in the mid-1990s, it is relatively easy to satisfy the requirements for mechanical and physical functionality of implantable devices. Therefore, the selection of materials for medical applications is usually based on considerations of biocompatibility. When metals and alloys are considered, the susceptibility of the material to corrosion and the effect the corrosion has on the tissue are the central aspects of biocompatibility. Corrosion resistance of the currently used 316L stainless steel, cobalt-chromium, and titanium-based implant alloys relies on their passivation by a thin surface layer of oxide. Stainless steel is the least corrosion resistant, and it is used for temporary implants only. The titanium and Co-Cr alloys do not corrode in the body; however, metal ions slowly diffuse through the oxide layer and accumulate in the tissue. When a metal implant is placed in the human body, it becomes surrounded by a layer of fibrous tissue of a thickness that is proportional to the amount and toxicity of the dissolution products and to the amount of motion between the implant and the adjacent tissues. Pure titanium may elicit a minimal fibrous encapsulation under some conditions, whereas the proliferation of a fibrous layer as much as 2 mm thick is encountered with the use of stainless steel implants. Superior fracture and fatigue resistance have made metals the materials of choice for traditional load-bearing applications. In this review, the functionality of currently used metals and alloys is discussed with respect to stenting applications. In addition, the "shape memory" and "pseudo-elasticity" properties of Nitinol-an alloy that is being considered for the manufacturing of urologic stents-are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9440845     DOI: 10.1089/end.1997.11.383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  35 in total

1.  Endovascular stenting for carotid artery stenosis: preliminary experience using the shape-memory- alloy-recoverable-technology (SMART) stent.

Authors:  C C Phatouros; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; T E Lempert; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Recovery of motor deficit, cerebellar serotonin and lipid peroxidation levels in the cortex of injured rats.

Authors:  Antonio Bueno-Nava; Rigoberto Gonzalez-Pina; Alfonso Alfaro-Rodriguez; Vladimir Nekrassov-Protasova; Alfredo Durand-Rivera; Sergio Montes; Fructuoso Ayala-Guerrero
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  A study of histological responses from Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy dental implants with and without plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating in dogs.

Authors:  I C Lavos-Valereto; B König; C Rossa; E Marcantonio; A C Zavaglia
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Coronary stents: in these days of climate change should all stents wear coats?

Authors:  R Lowe; I B A Menown; G Nogareda; I M Penn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  First in-human randomized comparison of an anodized niobium stent versus a standard stainless steel stent--an intravascular ultrasound and angiographic two-center study: the VELA study.

Authors:  F Beier; M Gyöngyösi; T Raeder; E von Eckardstein-Thumb; W Sperker; P Albrecht; C Spes; D Glogar; H Mudra
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Laser-treated stainless steel mini-screw implants: 3D surface roughness, bone-implant contact, and fracture resistance analysis.

Authors:  He-Kyong Kang; Tien-Min Chu; Paul Dechow; Kelton Stewart; Hee-Moon Kyung; Sean Shih-Yao Liu
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Xiaoyan Tang; Shalini V Gohil; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty - Do we have the answer? Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Timothy Little; Nicholas Little
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-29

9.  Biomimetic CaP coating incorporated with parathyroid hormone improves the osseointegration of titanium implant.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Liping Wang; Xi Jiang; David Rowe; Mei Wei
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Are clinical findings of systemic titanium dispersion following implantation explained by available in vitro evidence? An evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  Justin Paul Curtin; Minji Wang
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.358

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.