Literature DB >> 9440760

Influence of surgery on metachronous distant metastases and survival in rectal cancer.

F Köckerling1, M A Reymond, A Altendorf-Hofmann, O Dworak, W Hohenberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision (TME) and other technical surgical factors reduce local recurrence rate in rectal cancer. Scientific evidence of the positive effect of optimal surgery on survival is locking. Whether a reduction in the incidence of distant metastases can be achieved with optimal surgery is uncertain. We examine the effects of the quality of surgery, as reflected by local recurrence rate, on survival and the incidence of initial distant metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1974 and 1991, 1,581 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection (RO) for rectal carcinoma were monitored for recurrence and survival. TME was introduced in 1985. No patient received adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was greater than 13 years.
RESULTS: The local recurrence rate decreased from 39.4% to 9.8% during the study period (P < .0001). The observed 5-year survival rate improved from 50% to 71% (P < .0001). Three hundred six patients with local recurrence had a significantly lower observed 5-year survival rate (P < .0001). A total of 1,285 patients had no local recurrence, but 275 of them developed distant metastases (International Union Against Cancer [UICC] stage I, 8%; stage II, 16%; stage III, 40%). Better-quality surgery had no effect on the incidence of initial distant metastases, which remained constant (P = .44).
CONCLUSION: Quality of surgery is an independent prognostic factor for survival in rectal cancer, but has no influence on initial occurrence of distant metastases. Local recurrence cannot be considered an outcome criterion of adjuvant treatment without consideration of the surgeon as a risk factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9440760     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

1.  [Principles of postoperative therapy in rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  G Folprecht; C-H Köhne
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  "Mesorectum": the surgical value of an anatomical approach.

Authors:  M Diop; B Parratte; L Tatu; F Vuillier; S Brunelle; G Monnier
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  [Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer].

Authors:  W Hohenberger; G Lahmer; R Fietkau; R S Croner; S Merkel; J Göhl; R Sauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Adjuvant chemotherapy with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer previously treated by preoperative radiochemotherapy and curative tumor resection.

Authors:  Bert Hildebrandt; Beate Rau; Jürgen Löffel; Peter Wust; Annett Nicolaou; Johanna Gellermann; Philipp Le Coutre; Peter Neuhaus; Roland Felix; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Bernd Dörken; Hanno Riess
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  [Tumors of the lower gastrointestinal tract : Indication and extent of lymph node dissection].

Authors:  S Merkel; K Weber; A Perrakis; J Göhl; W Hohenberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas; Elyn Riedel; Laura D Cramer; Jose G Guillem; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  EGF61 polymorphism predicts complete pathologic response to cetuximab-based chemoradiation independent of KRAS status in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Daniel Vallbohmer; Wu Zhang; Dongyun Yang; Alexander Pohl; Melissa J Labonte; Peter P Grimminger; Arnulf H Hölscher; Robert Semrau; Dirk Arnold; Kathrin Dellas; Annelies Debucquoy; Karin Haustermans; Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Christine Sempoux; Claus Rödel; Matej Bracko; Vaneja Velenik; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinases in rectal cancer.

Authors:  O Schwandner; A Schlamp; R Broll; H P Bruch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) of anaerobic glycolysis as predictive and prognostic values in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Byoung Yong Shim; Ji-Han Jung; Kang-Moon Lee; Hyung-Jin Kim; Sook Hee Hong; Sung Hwan Kim; Der Sheng Sun; Hyeon-Min Cho
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Distal dissection in total mesorectal excision, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy and lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno; Tadao Tokoro
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.