Literature DB >> 9440730

Clinical prognostic and predictive factors for primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

P Ellis1, I Smith, S Ashley, G Walsh, S Ebbs, M Baum, N Sacks, J McKinna.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify clinical factors that are of prognostic significance or that predict for subsequent treatment outcome in patients with large operable breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy (PCT) at our institution.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-five patients received the following regimens: CMF or MMM (76 patients), ECF (75 patients), AC or FEC (34 patients), followed by surgery, with radiotherapy (RT) given to those with breast conservation. A number of common clinical variables were assessed in relation to local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Clinical responders had improved DFS (P = .009) and OS (P = .08) compared with nonresponders. There was no association between clinical or pathologic complete remission (CR) and survival. Pretreatment clinical axillary node positivity was a significant predictor of worsened DFS (P = .0001), OS (P = .0001), and LRFS (P = .03). Patients remaining clinically node-positive postchemotherapy had an inferior outcome compared with those becoming node-negative (DFS, P = .03; OS, P = .03) but pathologic axillary node status was not shown to predict for survival. Twenty-nine patients in clinical CR following PCT who electively did not have surgery and were treated with RT alone had significantly increased local recurrence rate compared with partial responders having surgery and RT (P = .02). There were no differences in DFS or OS between these groups. On multivariate analysis, clinical axillary node status was the only independent predictor of OS and DFS, and LRFS.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical axillary node status is a major predictor of outcome following PCT. Complete clinical response does not define a more favorable subgroup compared with those not obtaining CR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9440730     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

1.  Prognostic value of Bcl-2 in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Laura M Vargas-Roig; F Darío Cuello-Carrión; Nicolás Fernández-Escobar; Pedro Daguerre; Marcela Leuzzi; Jorge Ibarra; Francisco E Gago; Silvina B Nadin; Daniel R Ciocca
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-01-13       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Triple-negative breast cancer exhibits a favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy independent of the expression of topoisomerase IIα.

Authors:  Hiroko Nogi; Ken Uchida; Makiko Kamio; Kumiko Kato; Yasuo Toriumi; Tadashi Akiba; Toshiaki Morikawa; Masaaki Suzuki; Tadashi Kobayashi; Hiroshi Takeyama
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-21

3.  Genomic grade index is associated with response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Christos Hatzis; William Fraser Symmans; Christine Desmedt; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Vicente Valero; Henry Kuerer; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Christos Sotiriou; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  An increase in cancer stem cell population after primary systemic therapy is a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  H E Lee; J H Kim; Y J Kim; S Y Choi; S-W Kim; E Kang; I Y Chung; I A Kim; E J Kim; Y Choi; H S Ryu; S Y Park
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Pre-operative systemic therapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Em Ibrahim; Am Al-Gahmi; Jm Zekri; Ss Awadalla; Tr Elkhodary; Ee Fawzy; Ya Bahadur; Me Elsayed; A Zeeneldin; Rh Al-Ahmadi; Ah Linjawi
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2009-10-12

6.  Prognostic value of persistent node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J Y Pierga; E Mouret; V Diéras; V Laurence; P Beuzeboc; T Dorval; T Palangié; M Jouve; A Vincent-Salomon; S Scholl; J M Extra; B Asselain; P Pouillart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13

8.  Evaluation of biological pathways involved in chemotherapy response in breast cancer.

Authors:  Attila Tordai; Jing Wang; Fabrice Andre; Cornelia Liedtke; Kai Yan; Christos Sotiriou; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Bevacizumab plus preoperative chemotherapy in operable HER2 negative breast cancer: biomarkers and pathologic response.

Authors:  P Sánchez-Rovira; M A Seguí; A Llombart; E Aranda; A Antón; A Sánchez; M Lomas; A Jaén; M Fernández; I Porras; E Dalmau; S Morales; J de la Haba-Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Magnetic resonance metabolic profiling of breast cancer tissue obtained with core needle biopsy for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Hyeon-Man Baek; Suhkmann Kim; Min Jung Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim; Youn Ki Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.