Literature DB >> 9440720

Expression of the adhesion molecule ICAM-1 in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: relationship with tumor dissemination and prognostic importance.

M J Terol1, A López-Guillermo, F Bosch, N Villamor, M C Cid, C Rozman, E Campo, E Montserrat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) by non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and to assess its correlation with disease extension and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICAM-1 (CD54-IOL54) expression was studied in 70 patients (35 male/35 female; median age, 56 years) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from a single institution. Immunostaining was performed using a streptavidine-biotin alkaline phosphatase method and ICAM-1 expression was evaluated in a semiquantitative manner. The histologic distribution of the cases was the following: small lymphocytic, five cases; follicular, 14; mantle cell, five; diffuse large cell, 41; and T lymphoblastic, five. Forty patients (57%) were in stage IV, bulky disease was observed in 25 patients (36%), and extranodal involvement in 48 patients (69%).
RESULTS: ICAM-1 expression was negative (-) in 14 patients (20%), weak (+) in 21 (30%), positive (++) in 30 (43%), and strongly positive ( ) in five (7%). No significant relationship was found between ICAM-1 expression and the lymphoma histologic subtype. Patients with negative or weak ICAM-1 expression had more frequently disseminated (stage IV) disease (74% v 40%; P = .007), extranodal involvement (86% v 51%; P = .004), and bone marrow infiltration (57% v 26%; P = .015) than the remainders. Positive ICAM-1 patients had survival rates significantly better than those in whom ICAM-1 was negative or weakly expressed [2-year overall survival: 77% v 50%, respectively; P < .025]. In a multivariate study, ICAM-1 (P = .005) maintained, along with histologic subtype (P = .001) and the international prognostic index (IPI) (P = .056), its importance for predicting survival. Finally, when the group of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients was analyzed, ICAM-1 expression inversely correlated with advanced stage (P = .025), extranodal involvement (P = .01), and bone marrow infiltration (P = .01), complete response (CR) achievement (65% v 32%; P = .025), and overall survival (70% v 26% at 2 years; P < .005).
CONCLUSION: In lymphoma patients, ICAM-1 expression correlates with lymphoma dissemination and is useful to assess prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9440720     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

Review 1.  Beyond R-CHOP and the IPI in large-cell lymphoma: molecular markers as an opportunity for stratification.

Authors:  Jason R Westin; Luis E Fayad
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Clinical significance of co-expression of CD21 and LFA-1 in B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Kazushi Tanimoto; Yoshihiro Yakushijin; Hiroshi Fujiwara; Masaki Otsuka; Koichi Ohshima; Atsuro Sugita; Akira Sakai; Takaaki Hato; Hitoshi Hasegawa; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Differential expression of alternatively spliced transcripts related to energy metabolism in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anastasiya Vladimirovna Snezhkina; George Sergeevich Krasnov; Andrew Rostislavovich Zaretsky; Alex Zhavoronkov; Kirill Mikhailovich Nyushko; Alexey Alexandrovich Moskalev; Irina Yurievna Karpova; Anastasiya Isaevna Afremova; Anastasiya Valerievna Lipatova; Dmitriy Vladimitovich Kochetkov; Maria Sergeena Fedorova; Nadezhda Nikolaevna Volchenko; Asiya Fayazovna Sadritdinova; Nataliya Vladimirovna Melnikova; Dmitry Vladimirovich Sidorov; Anatoly Yurievich Popov; Dmitry Valerievich Kalinin; Andrey Dmitrievich Kaprin; Boris Yakovlevich Alekseev; Alexey Alexandrovich Dmitriev; Anna Viktorovna Kudryavtseva
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Microarray analysis of B-cell lymphoma cell lines with the t(14;18).

Authors:  Ryan S Robetorye; Sandra D Bohling; John W Morgan; G Chris Fillmore; Megan S Lim; Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  A new approach for eradication of residual lymphoma cells by host nonreactive anti-third-party central memory CD8 T cells.

Authors:  Assaf Lask; Eran Ophir; Noga Or-Geva; Adva Cohen-Fredarow; Ran Afik; Yaki Eidelstein; Shlomit Reich-Zeliger; Bar Nathansohn; Matthias Edinger; Robert S Negrin; David Hagin; Yair Reisner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Review of the molecular profile and modern prognostic markers for gastric lymphoma: how do they affect clinical practice?

Authors:  Leonidas Alevizos; Ilias P Gomatos; Spyridon Smparounis; Manousos M Konstadoulakis; Georgios Zografos
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Molecular prognostic factors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Daniel Morgensztern; Izidore S Lossos
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-07

Review 8.  Pathogenic Role of Exosomes in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-Associated Cancers.

Authors:  Sin-Yeang Teow; Kitson Liew; Alan Soo-Beng Khoo; Suat-Cheng Peh
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 9.  Hide or defend, the two strategies of lymphoma immune evasion: potential implications for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Marie de Charette; Roch Houot
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Differential B-Cell Receptor Signaling Requirement for Adhesion of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells to Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Laia Sadeghi; Gustav Arvidsson; Magali Merrien; Agata M Wasik; André Görgens; C I Edvard Smith; Birgitta Sander; Anthony P Wright
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.