Literature DB >> 9437564

Colocolic fistula caused by a previously inserted intrauterine device. Case report.

I R Pirwany1, K Boddy.   

Abstract

Uterine perforation remains the most serious complication of the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). It is more common in the puerperium, usually occurring at the time of insertion of a new device. Perforation may, however, also occur in the puerperium if a pre-existing device is not removed in early pregnancy or extruded at the time of delivery. The case is presented of a 30-year-old woman who became pregnant for the third time following insertion of an IUD in the puerperium of her second pregnancy. An uneventful pregnancy and delivery followed. Failure to detect the IUD at the time of delivery led to laparoscopy and laparotomy to locate the device. A colotomy was necessary to retrieve the device, which had formed a colocolic fistula. It is concluded that the puerperium remains the time of greatest risk of uterine perforation by an IUD. Although most occur at the time of insertion, this complication can also occur with a previously inserted device. Severe intra-abdominal complications may ensue if the device is not localized and removed. Laparotomy is justified if the laparoscopic removal is unsuccessful. A high degree of suspicion is necessary if serious consequences are to be avoided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Case Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods--complications; Developed Countries; Diseases; Europe; Family Planning; Gastrointestinal Effects; Iud--complications; Northern Europe; Perforations; Physiology; Research Methodology; Research Report; Scotland; Studies; United Kingdom; Uterine Perforation

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9437564     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00161-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

1.  Incidental detection of a transmigrated intrauterine device.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Levsky; Mark Herskovits
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-05-14

2.  Laparoscopic removal of a perforated intrauterine device from the perirectal fat.

Authors:  P D Silva; K M Larson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Penetration of the descending colon by a migrating intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  Jung Min Park; Chang Seog Lee; Min Seong Kim; Do Young Kim; Chul Young Kim; Young Bae Lim; Yong Kyu Lee; Dong Eun Park; Dong Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-12-31

4.  Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report.

Authors:  Amila Weerasekera; Pravin Wijesinghe; Nilhan Nugaduwa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-04

Review 5.  Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.

Authors:  Sam Rowlands; Emeka Oloto; David H Horwell
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-03-16

6.  Intrauterine device found in an ovarian tumor: A case report.

Authors:  Yongyu An; Chang Liu; Fan Mao; Guangzhao Yang; Guoqun Mao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.