Literature DB >> 9437461

The potential for using administrative and clinical data to analyze outcomes for the cognitively impaired: an assessment of the minimum data set for nursing homes.

C D Phillips1, J N Morris.   

Abstract

Quite frequently, data from administrative or clinical data sets are not considered suitable for research because of concerns about their validity and reliability. The authors discuss the important role that such data sets may play in the future of health care. To provide an indication that all administrative and clinical data bases do not provide inferior data, the authors compare the internal consistency and predictive validity of information from three statewide administrative/clinical databases, focusing on nursing home residents with comparable data from a research database. These databases contain information gathered using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Nursing Home Resident Assessment and Care Screening. The two dimensions of status considered in this illustration are cognition and physical function. The results of this comparison indicate that the assessment data in three statewide clinical/administrative databases are as reliable and valid as the data found in the research database. Finally, the authors discuss the precepts one might follow in developing clinical/administrative databases that provide good data. These precepts also can be used as guidelines in the evaluation of the probable usefulness of such databases for assessing outcomes among cognitively impaired nursing home residents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9437461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  9 in total

1.  Use of physical restraints and psychotropic medications in Alzheimer special care units in nursing homes.

Authors:  C D Phillips; K M Spry; P D Sloane; C Hawes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Rurality and nursing home quality: results from a national sample of nursing home admissions.

Authors:  Charles D Phillips; Scott Holan; Michael Sherman; Malgorzata Leyk Williams; Catherine Hawes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The Impact of Dementia Special Care Units on Quality of Care: An Instrumental Variables Analysis.

Authors:  Nina R Joyce; Thomas G McGuire; Stephen J Bartels; Susan L Mitchell; David C Grabowski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Stability of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do-not-resuscitate orders among long-term nursing home residents.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Heather Ladd; Helena Temkin-Greener
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The residential history file: studying nursing home residents' long-term care histories(*).

Authors:  Orna Intrator; Jeffrey Hiris; Katherine Berg; Susan C Miller; Vince Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Evaluation of data quality of interRAI assessments in home and community care.

Authors:  Sophie E Hogeveen; Jonathan Chen; John P Hirdes
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Comparing the functional independence measure and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christine Glenny; Paul Stolee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Health status utilities and the impact of pressure ulcers in long-term care residents in Ontario.

Authors:  Hla-Hla Thein; Tara Gomes; Murray D Krahn; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  An evaluation of data quality in Canada's Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS): secondary analyses of Ontario data submitted between 1996 and 2011.

Authors:  John P Hirdes; Jeff W Poss; Hilary Caldarelli; Brant E Fries; John N Morris; Gary F Teare; Kristen Reidel; Norma Jutan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.