Literature DB >> 9436336

Efficacy of senna versus lactulose in terminal cancer patients treated with opioids.

Y Agra1, A Sacristán, M González, M Ferrari, A Portugués, M J Calvo.   

Abstract

The best laxative for terminal cancer patients treated with opioids still remains to be determined. This comparative study was conducted with the objective of determining treatment and cost efficiency for senna and lactulose in terminal cancer patients treated with opioids. The methodology used a randomized, open, parallel group design. The study was conducted in the Palliative Care Unit in one Madrid Health Care District. Ninety-one terminal cancer patients were randomized into two groups: A = treated with senna (starting with 0.4 mL daily), and B = treated with lactulose (starting with 15 mL daily) for a 27-day period. The main outcome measures were defecation-free intervals of 72 hr, days with defecation, general health status, and treatment cost. Laxative efficacy was analyzed through t test and analysis of variance. No difference was found between the laxatives in defecation-free intervals or in days with defecation. The final scores for general health status were similar in both groups. Given that the two treatments have similar efficacy and adverse effects, a recommendation is made for the use of senna because its cost is lower than lactulose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9436336     DOI: 10.1016/S0885-3924(97)00276-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  14 in total

1.  Lack of objective evidence of efficacy of laxatives in chronic constipation.

Authors:  Michael P Jones; Nicholas J Talley; Guy Nuyts; Dominique Dubois
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio Cesar Tamayo; Paola Andrea Diaz-Zuluaga
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Evolving paradigms in the treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.

Authors:  Jakob Lykke Poulsen; Christina Brock; Anne Estrup Olesen; Matias Nilsson; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 4.  [Is the pharmacological treatment of constipation in palliative care evidence based? : a systematic literature review].

Authors:  S Bader; M Weber; G Becker
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Surveillance of suspected adverse reactions to herbal products used as laxatives.

Authors:  Annabella Vitalone; Francesca Menniti-Ippolito; Roberto Raschetti; Francesca Renda; Loriana Tartaglia; Gabriela Mazzanti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Constipation in people prescribed opioids.

Authors:  Sam H Ahmedzai; Jason Boland
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-04-06

7.  PEG vs. sennosides for opioid-induced constipation in cancer care.

Authors:  Philippa Hawley; Hannah MacKenzie; Monica Gobbo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  [Methylnaltrexone. A new approach for therapy of opioid-induced obstipation].

Authors:  D Chappell; P Conzen
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Less nausea, emesis, and constipation comparing hydromorphone and morphine? A prospective open-labeled investigation on cancer pain.

Authors:  S Wirz; H C Wartenberg; J Nadstawek
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Ethical care at the end of life.

Authors:  E J Latimer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.