Literature DB >> 9435076

Protozoan bacterivory and Escherichia coli survival in drinking water distribution systems.

I Sibille1, T Sime-Ngando, L Mathieu, J C Block.   

Abstract

The development of bacterial communities in drinking water distribution systems leads to a food chain which supports the growth of macroorganisms incompatible with water quality requirements and esthetics. Nevertheless, very few studies have examined the microbial communities in drinking water distribution systems and their trophic relationships. This study was done to quantify the microbial communities (especially bacteria and protozoa) and obtain direct and indirect proof of protozoan feeding on bacteria in two distribution networks, one of GAC water (i.e., water filtered on granular activated carbon) and the other of nanofiltered water. The nanofiltered water-supplied network contained no organisms larger than bacteria, either in the water phase (on average, 5 x 10(7) bacterial cells liter-1) or in the biofilm (on average, 7 x 10(6) bacterial cells cm-2). No protozoa were detected in the whole nanofiltered water-supplied network (water plus biofilm). In contrast, the GAC water-supplied network contained bacteria (on average, 3 x 10(8) cells liter-1 in water and 4 x 10(7) cells cm-2 in biofilm) and protozoa (on average, 10(5) cells liter-1 in water and 10(3) cells cm-2 in biofilm). The water contained mostly flagellates (93%), ciliates (1.8%), thecamoebae (1.6%), and naked amoebae (1.1%). The biofilm had only ciliates (52%) and thecamoebae (48%). Only the ciliates at the solid-liquid interface of the GAC water-supplied network had a measurable grazing activity in laboratory test (estimated at 2 bacteria per ciliate per h). Protozoan ingestion of bacteria was indirectly shown by adding Escherichia coli to the experimental distribution systems. Unexpectedly, E. coli was lost from the GAC water-supplied network more rapidly than from the nanofiltered water-supplied network, perhaps because of the grazing activity of protozoa in GAC water but not in nanofiltered water. Thus, the GAC water-supplied network contained a functional ecosystem with well-established and structured microbial communities, while the nanofiltered water-supplied system did not. The presence of protozoa in drinking water distribution systems must not be neglected because these populations may regulate the autochthonous and allochthonous bacterial populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9435076      PMCID: PMC124693     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  11 in total

1.  Bacterial nutrients in drinking water.

Authors:  M W LeChevallier; W Schulz; R G Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Rates of digestion of bacteria by marine phagotrophic protozoa: temperature dependence.

Authors:  B F Sherr; E B Sherr; F Rassoulzadegan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory.

Authors:  B F Sherr; E B Sherr; R D Fallon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Rapid quantification of planktonic ciliates: comparison of improved live counting with other methods.

Authors:  T Sime-Ngando; H J Hartmann; C A Groliere
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Protistan Bacterivory in an Oligomesotrophic Lake: Importance of Attached Ciliates and Flagellates

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Isolation of protozoa from water associated with a legionellosis outbreak and demonstration of intracellular multiplication of Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  J M Barbaree; B S Fields; J C Feeley; G W Gorman; W T Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Influence of water chlorination on the counting of bacteria with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole).

Authors:  S Saby; I Sibille; L Mathieu; J L Paquin; J C Block
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Novel method for studying the public health significance of macroinvertebrates occurring in potable water.

Authors:  R V Levy; R D Cheetham; J Davis; G Winer; F L Hart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Colonization and disinfection of biofilms hosting coliform-colonized carbon fines.

Authors:  P Morin; A Camper; W Jones; D Gatel; J C Goldman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Interaction of Legionella pneumophila with Acanthamoeba castellanii: uptake by coiling phagocytosis and inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion.

Authors:  J A Bozue; W Johnson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  14 in total

1.  Susceptibility of biofilms to Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus attack.

Authors:  Daniel Kadouri; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biofilms and Helicobacter pylori: Dissemination and persistence within the environment and host.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Louise Suleman
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Relationships between free-living protozoa, cultivable Legionella spp., and water quality characteristics in three drinking water supplies in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Rinske M Valster; Bart A Wullings; Riemsdijk van den Berg; Dick van der Kooij
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Biofilm formation and phenotypic variation enhance predation-driven persistence of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Carsten Matz; Diane McDougald; Ana Maria Moreno; Pui Yi Yung; Fitnat H Yildiz; Staffan Kjelleberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Vulnerability of pathogenic biofilms to Micavibrio aeruginosavorus.

Authors:  Daniel Kadouri; Nel C Venzon; George A O'Toole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Protistan grazing analysis by flow cytometry using prey labeled by in vivo expression of fluorescent proteins.

Authors:  Yutao Fu; Charles O'Kelly; Michael Sieracki; Daniel L Distel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Behavior of an Aeromonas hydrophila aroA live vaccine in water microcosms.

Authors:  José Vivas; Begoña Carracedo; Jorge Riaño; Blanca E Razquin; Pilar López-Fierro; Félix Acosta; Germán Naharro; Alberto J Villena
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effect of Phosphorus on survival of Escherichia coli in drinking water biofilms.

Authors:  Talis Juhna; Dagne Birzniece; Janis Rubulis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Free-living protozoa in two unchlorinated drinking water supplies, identified by phylogenic analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences.

Authors:  Rinske M Valster; Bart A Wullings; Geo Bakker; Hauke Smidt; Dick van der Kooij
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Biodegradation of microcystins during gravity-driven membrane (GDM) ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Esther Kohler; Jörg Villiger; Thomas Posch; Nicolas Derlon; Tanja Shabarova; Eberhard Morgenroth; Jakob Pernthaler; Judith F Blom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.