Literature DB >> 9434590

Differences in bimanual coordination associated with stuttering.

H N Zelaznik1, A Smith, E A Franz, M Ho.   

Abstract

The motor coordination of adults who stutter was examined in the performance of a bimanual movement task. Fifteen subjects who stutter and 15 matched subjects who do not stutter performed three trials of a bimanual finger movement task. Subjects were required to produce a flexion and extension movement of the metacarpophalangeal joint of each index finger in rhythm to a metronome. The rate of movement increased during the 70 s trial. Stutterers could maintain movements at the prescribed rate as well as nonstutterers; however, stutterers moved with less amplitude and peak velocity. In addition, dynamical analysis revealed that subjects who stutter exhibited greater relative phase variability than subjects who do not stutter. These results shed new light on the mixed results of earlier studies on nonspeech motor performance of individuals who stutter and suggest that there are strategic differences as well as coordination differences that should be observable across a variety on motor tasks requiring coordination of multiple effectors.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9434590     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00014-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  16 in total

1.  Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: probing the relationship between event and emergent timing.

Authors:  Howard N Zelaznik; Rebecca M C Spencer; Richard B Ivry; Alex Baria; Melissa Bloom; Lisa Dolansky; Shannon Justice; Kristen Patterson; Emily Whetter
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Evidence That Bimanual Motor Timing Performance Is Not a Significant Factor in Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Allison I Hilger; Howard Zelaznik; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Generalized motor abilities and timing behavior in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Howard N Zelaznik; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in preschoolers who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Evidence that a motor timing deficit is a factor in the development of stuttering.

Authors:  Lindsey Olander; Anne Smith; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  A Lag in Speech Motor Coordination During Sentence Production Is Associated With Stuttering Persistence in Young Children.

Authors:  Evan Usler; Anne Smith; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Amanda Hampton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Control and prediction components of movement planning in stuttering versus nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Dissociated Development of Speech and Limb Sensorimotor Learning in Stuttering: Speech Auditory-motor Learning is Impaired in Both Children and Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ayoub Daliri; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.