Literature DB >> 9433754

Geometrical illusions: study and modelling.

A Bulatov1, A Bertulis, L Mickiene.   

Abstract

The phenomena of geometrical illusions of extent suggest that the metric of a perceived field is different from the metric of a physical stimulus. The present study investigated the Müller-Lyer and Oppel-Kundt illusions as functions of spatial parameters of the figures, and constructed a neurophysiological model. The main idea of the modelling is based on the uncertainty principle, according to which distortions of size relations of certain parts of the stimulus, so-called geometrical illusions, are determined by processes of spatial filtering in the visual system. Qualitative and quantitative agreement was obtained between psychophysical measurement of the strength value of the illusions and the predictions of our model.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9433754     DOI: 10.1007/s004220050399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  9 in total

1.  Reaction times and perceptual adjustments are sensitive to the illusory distortion of space.

Authors:  Silvia Savazzi; Barbara Emanuele; Paige Scalf; Diane Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of distractors on the perception of right angles.

Authors:  A Bulatov; A Bertulis; A Bieliavicius; E Loginovic
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-08

3.  Distortions in length perception: visual field anisotropy and geometrical illusions.

Authors:  A Bertulis; A Bulatov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05

Review 4.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Quantitative examination of an unconventional form of the filled-space illusion.

Authors:  Aleksandr Bulatov; Natalija Bulatova; Edgaras Diržius
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  VEP Responses to Op-Art Stimuli.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Alasdair D F Clarke; Petra M J Pollux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Geometrical illusions are not always where you think they are: a review of some classical and less classical illusions, and ways to describe them.

Authors:  Jacques Ninio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Onset-Duration Matching of Acoustic Stimuli Revisited: Conventional Arithmetic vs. Proposed Geometric Measures of Accuracy and Precision.

Authors:  Björn Friedrich; Peter Heil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-06

9.  The Müller-Lyer illusion in ant foraging.

Authors:  Tomoko Sakiyama; Yukio-Pegio Gunji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.