STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected from 183 subjects who were randomly assigned to the training and test groups. During testing of the classification system, knowledge of the low back pain condition or motion characteristics of the patients in the test group was not made available to the system. OBJECTIVES: To determine specific characteristics of trunk motion associated with different categories of spinal disorders and to determine whether a neural network analysis system can be effective in distinguishing patterns. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous studies have established the difficulty of evaluating lower back pain. Imaging techniques are expensive and ineffective in many cases. A technique for evaluation of lower back pain was developed on the basis of analysis of such dynamic motion features as shape, velocity, and symmetry of movements, using a neural network classification system. METHODS: Dynamic motion data were collected from 183 subjects using a triaxial goniometer. Features of the movement were extracted and provided as input to a two-stage neural network classifier governed by a radial basis function architecture. After training, the output of the classifier was compared with Québec Task Force pain classifications obtained for the patients. Linear and nonlinear classification techniques were compared. RESULTS: The system could determine low back pain classification from motion characteristics. The neural network classifier produced the best results with up to 85% accuracy on novel "validation" data. CONCLUSIONS: A neural network based on kinematic data is an excellent predictive model for classification of lower back pain. Such a system could markedly improve the management of lower back pain in the individual patient.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected from 183 subjects who were randomly assigned to the training and test groups. During testing of the classification system, knowledge of the low back pain condition or motion characteristics of the patients in the test group was not made available to the system. OBJECTIVES: To determine specific characteristics of trunk motion associated with different categories of spinal disorders and to determine whether a neural network analysis system can be effective in distinguishing patterns. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous studies have established the difficulty of evaluating lower back pain. Imaging techniques are expensive and ineffective in many cases. A technique for evaluation of lower back pain was developed on the basis of analysis of such dynamic motion features as shape, velocity, and symmetry of movements, using a neural network classification system. METHODS: Dynamic motion data were collected from 183 subjects using a triaxial goniometer. Features of the movement were extracted and provided as input to a two-stage neural network classifier governed by a radial basis function architecture. After training, the output of the classifier was compared with Québec Task Force pain classifications obtained for the patients. Linear and nonlinear classification techniques were compared. RESULTS: The system could determine low back pain classification from motion characteristics. The neural network classifier produced the best results with up to 85% accuracy on novel "validation" data. CONCLUSIONS: A neural network based on kinematic data is an excellent predictive model for classification of lower back pain. Such a system could markedly improve the management of lower back pain in the individual patient.
Authors: Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2020-07-09
Authors: Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2020-07-09
Authors: Ana Vanessa Bataller-Cervero; Juan Rabal-Pelay; Luis Enrique Roche-Seruendo; Belén Lacárcel-Tejero; Andrés Alcázar-Crevillén; Jose Antonio Villalba-Ruete; Cristina Cimarras-Otal Journal: Ind Health Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 2.179