Literature DB >> 9430569

One- versus two-incision technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft. Results on early rehabilitation and stability.

T G Gerich1, C Lattermann, R W Fremerey, J Zeichen, H P Lobenhoffer.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with patellar tendon graft has become a standard procedure. The graft can be inserted either using two tunnels and a lateral femoral incision or with a femoral half-tunnel drilled from the joint, thus avoiding the lateral incision. Advantages have been claimed for the single-incision technique in the early rehabilitation period. Forty patients with ACL deficiency were included in a prospective randomized trial comparing the single- and two-incision technique with a follow-up period of 12 months. Preoperative data did not show any significant difference between the two groups. At early follow-up no differences were observed with respect to complications or the progress of rehabilitation. Evaluation at 12 months postoperatively using the IKDC form revealed good to excellent results in 70% of patients. ACL reconstruction reduced anterior translation of the knee significantly at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up with a slight increase of MMD values at 12 months in both groups. The arthroscopic single-incision technique did not differ from the mini-open technique in terms of postoperative pain medication, incidence of effusion, postoperative range-of-motion or any rehabilitation parameters. Stability was comparable in both groups at all time periods. We conclude that an arthroscopic single-incision technique has no advantage over a mini-open two-incision technique for ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon graft in terms of subjective or objective parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9430569     DOI: 10.1007/s001670050052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  7 in total

1.  [ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft and proximal fixation with the EndoButton: a 2- to 5-year follow-up].

Authors:  K Tecklenburg; C Hoser; R Sailer; J Oberladstätter; C Fink
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  One-incision versus two-incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adults.

Authors:  Fernando C Rezende; Vinícius Y Moraes; Carlos Es Franciozi; Pedro Debieux; Marcus V Luzo; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-15

3.  Transtibial ACL femoral tunnel preparation increases odds of repeat ipsilateral knee surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Duffee; Robert A Magnussen; Angela D Pedroza; David C Flanigan; Christopher C Kaeding
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation.

Authors:  Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Independent Versus Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression.

Authors:  Marco Cuzzolin; Davide Previtali; Marco Delcogliano; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian; Alberto Grassi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-12

6.  A cadaver study of the structures and positions of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans.

Authors:  Ahmad Bagheri Moghaddam; Ali Torkaman
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04

7.  The occurrence of osteoarthritis at a minimum of ten years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Cor P van der Hart; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Thomas W Patt
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.