Literature DB >> 9430242

Trabecular bone volume and microdamage accumulation in the femoral heads of women with and without femoral neck fractures.

S Mori1, R Harruff, W Ambrosius, D B Burr.   

Abstract

Repetitive loading causes fragility and microdamage accumulation in the skeleton, but it is not clear whether microcracks accumulate with age in the human skeleton, or whether older women with femoral neck fractures have more microdamage than older women without fracture. This study tested the hypotheses that: (1) microcracks accumulate in the femoral head with age; and (2) older women with femoral neck fractures have significantly more microcracks than similar aged women without fractures. Nonosteoarthritic femoral heads from 9 young (16-66 years) and 12 old (73-88 years) female cadavers and those from 7 females with femoral neck fractures (56-90 years) were dissected. Midfrontal slabs were block stained with 1% basic fuchsin and 150-microm-thick specimens were measured histomorphometrically. Percent trabecular bone area (TbxAr) significantly decreased in older and fractured subjects compared with young subjects (p < or = 0.05). Microcrack density (CrxDn) was significantly higher in women older than 70 years compared with those younger than 70 (p = 0.005; Spearman's r = 0.41, p = 0.032), but was not different between older women with and without fractures. Osteocyte lacunar density (OtxDn) was significantly less in old and fractured subjects compared with young subjects (p < or = 0.01), and inversely correlated to crack density (r = -0.49, p = 0.011). CrxDn was higher in women with low TbxAr (Spearman's r = -0.56; p = 0.004), and varied inversely with OtxDn (Spearman's r = -0.47; p = 0.014). This is consistent with the idea that cracks accumulate more rapidly in women with low bone density. It is also consistent with the idea that the osteocyte network detects microcracks, and signals for their repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9430242     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00200-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  42 in total

Review 1.  Microdamage and bone strength.

Authors:  David Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone microdamage.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Is bone quality associated with collagen age?

Authors:  D J Leeming; K Henriksen; I Byrjalsen; P Qvist; S H Madsen; P Garnero; M A Karsdal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Hierarchy of Bone Microdamage at Multiple Length Scales.

Authors:  Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Int J Fatigue       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.186

5.  Changes in osteocyte density correspond with changes in osteoblast and osteoclast activity in an osteoporotic sheep model.

Authors:  M R Zarrinkalam; A Mulaibrahimovic; G J Atkins; R J Moore
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  New laboratory tools in the assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  D Chappard; M F Baslé; E Legrand; M Audran
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Methodological approach for the detection of both microdamage and fluorochrome labels in ewe bone and human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Brigitte Burt-Pichat; Hélène Follet; Gwendoline Toulemonde; Monique Arlot; Pierre Delmas; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 8.  Changes in the osteocyte lacunocanalicular network with aging.

Authors:  LeAnn M Tiede-Lewis; Sarah L Dallas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Determination of rat vertebral bone compressive fatigue properties in untreated intact rats and zoledronic-acid-treated, ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  J E M Brouwers; M Ruchelsman; B v Rietbergen; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.