Literature DB >> 9429983

ABR and DPOAE detection of cochlear damage by gentamicin.

Y Shi1, W H Martin.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) have been applied to the evaluation of peripheral auditory function. To date, no comparison of their relative sensitivities to aminoglycoside toxicity has been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare click evoked ABR testing and 2f1-f2 DPOAEs as detectors of cochlear damage induced by gentamicin treatment in guinea-pigs. ABR thresholds to click stimuli were recorded. DPOAE amplitude input/output functions were recorded using three different primary tone level conditions. In one condition, L1 was changed relative to a fixed L2. In the next condition, L2 was changed relative to a fixed L1. In the third condition, L1 and L2 were both changed while maintaining a consistent L1-L2 difference. Baseline L1-L2 differences were determined by adjusting L2 to produce the maximum DPOAE amplitude in each ear of each subject. Guinea-pigs were treated for a four week period with intramuscular injections of gentamicin. ABRs and DPOAEs were monitored and compared to baseline recordings or untreated control groups. DPOAE testing detected cochlear damage earlier than ABR testing. Changes in DPOAE input/output functions were noted after two weeks of treatment while changes in ABR threshold were not identified until after three weeks of treatment. The sensitivity of the DPOAE testing was related to the stimulus conditions utilized. L1-L2 differences were determined in the control group and for the initial test session by fixing L1 at 75 dB SPL and lowering L2 until the maximum DPOAE amplitude was obtained for each ear. All subsequent testing was begun using the optimal L1-L2 difference for each ear. The stimulus condition in which only L1 was changed and L2 was fixed resulted in the least sensitive DPOAE indicator of cochlear damage. The condition in which both L1 and L2 were changed, but the L1-L2 difference remained constant, resulted in the most sensitive indicator of damage. The onset and degree of cochlear damage secondary to gentamicin treatment was subject dependent. This study demonstrates that 2f1-f2 DPOAE testing is preferable to click evoked ABR testing for early detection of gentamicin toxicity of the cochlea. It also indicates that DPOAE stimulus parameters must be considered when developing test protocols. Specifically, recording the DPOAE amplitude input/output function while maintaining an effective L1-L2 difference is preferable to changing either L1 or L2 individually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9429983     DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp.1997.8.3.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0792-6855


  5 in total

1.  Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices.

Authors:  N S Seixas; B Goldman; L Sheppard; R Neitzel; S Norton; S G Kujawa
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Temporary reduction of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) immediately following auditory brainstem response (ABR).

Authors:  Anand N Mhatre; Bobby Tajudeen; Elena M Welt; Christopher Wartmann; Glenis R Long; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome on neonatal hearing screening outcomes following gentamicin exposure.

Authors:  Campbell P Cross; Selena Liao; Zachary D Urdang; Priya Srikanth; Angela C Garinis; Peter S Steyger
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Level alterations of the 2f (1)-f (2) distortion product due to hypoxia in the guinea pig depend on the stimulus frequency.

Authors:  Bernhard Olzowy; Gregor von Gleichenstein; Martin Canis; Nikolaus Plesnila; Sebastian Strieth; Christoph Deppe; Klaus Mees
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Are systemic voriconazole and caspofungin ototoxic? An experimental study with rats.

Authors:  Emine Aydın; Filiz Aydoğan; Eren Taştan; Ayşe Iriz; Gökhan Karaca; Ilknur Haberal Can
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.372

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.