Literature DB >> 9429370

Effectiveness of medication calculation enhancement methods with nurses.

T Bayne1, R Bindler.   

Abstract

Medication calculation errors occur in all settings and can cause serious disruption in treatment protocols. This experimental study used a pretest-posttest, control group design. Sixty-seven RNs from three healthcare agencies completed all phases of the study. All nurses completed a 20-item medication calculation test, used both as the pretest and the posttest, and completed a short questionnaire that contained demographic and attitudinal items. After taking the pretest, nurses were assigned randomly to one of three experimental groups or a control group. Intervention times for the experimental groups totaled 3 hours, followed by a posttest 4 to 5 months after the pretest. Scores on the pretest ranged from 25% to 100% (mean = 75.5%, standard deviation = 15.13) and from 30% to 100% on the posttest (mean = 80%, standard deviation = 14.72). Scores improved for all groups except the self-study workbook group. No significant difference was found between the experimental groups or the control group for posttest medication calculation test scores. The classroom intervention was most costly, and the workbook intervention was least costly. The nurses identified the workbook intervention as the most satisfying method and computer-assisted instruction (CAI) as least satisfying. A strong positive correlation existed between the nurses' self-assessment of comfort and skill levels with medication calculation test scores. Questions necessitating multiple calculations and those necessitating a conversion not provided were the most difficult to answer correctly. Staff development educators need to address their role in improving the effectiveness of medication calculation.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9429370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Staff Dev        ISSN: 0882-0627


  11 in total

1.  Computerized pharmaceutical algorithm reduces medication administration errors during simulated resuscitations.

Authors:  Girish G Deshpande; Adalberto Torres; David L Buchanan; Susan C Shane Gray; Suzanne C Brown; Theresa Hoadley; Patricia L Ruppel; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-10

2.  Impact of a required pharmaceutical calculations course on mathematics ability and knowledge retention.

Authors:  Michael A Hegener; Shauna M Buring; Elizabeth Papas
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Medication knowledge, certainty, and risk of errors in health care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bjoerg O Simonsen; Inger Johansson; Gro K Daehlin; Lene Merete Osvik; Per G Farup
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: failure mode effects analysis.

Authors:  M Apkon; J Leonard; L Probst; L DeLizio; R Vitale
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-08

5.  A risk analysis method to evaluate the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on patient safety.

Authors:  Pascal Bonnabry; Christelle Despont-Gros; Damien Grauser; Pierre Casez; Magali Despond; Deborah Pugin; Claire Rivara-Mangeat; Magali Koch; Martine Vial; Anne Iten; Christian Lovis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Medication errors in children.

Authors:  Eran Kozer
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.022

7.  Differences in medication knowledge and risk of errors between graduating nursing students and working registered nurses: comparative study.

Authors:  Bjoerg O Simonsen; Gro K Daehlin; Inger Johansson; Per G Farup
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Improvement of drug dose calculations by classroom teaching or e-learning: a randomised controlled trial in nurses.

Authors:  Bjoerg O Simonsen; Gro K Daehlin; Inger Johansson; Per G Farup
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Measuring human-error probabilities in drug preparation: a pilot simulation study.

Authors:  P Garnerin; B Pellet-Meier; P Chopard; T Perneger; P Bonnabry
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alexandre Vallée; Jacques Blacher; Alain Cariou; Emmanuel Sorbets
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.