Literature DB >> 9429010

Playing with metal: fracture implants and contact sport.

N A Evans1, R O Evans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of athletes returning to contact sport with indwelling fracture implants.
METHOD: A retrospective analysis of professional rugby union players competing in the South Wales premier league.
RESULTS: Fifteen athletes were identified who had returned to competitive rugby union with retained fracture implants during the period 1990-97. After fracture fixation, the players resumed their preinjury level of contact sport within one to 12 months. Only two athletes suffered complications in relation to the retained implant, whereas the other 13 athletes played for up to six years without symptoms.
CONCLUSION: The results from this preliminary series suggest that an early return to contact sport is feasible in selected cases. Avoiding the extended delay associated with implant removal affords not only minimal disruption to competitive participation, but also prevents prolonged financial losses for the professional player.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9429010      PMCID: PMC1332567          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.31.4.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  5 in total

1.  Complications of metalwork removal.

Authors:  P L Sanderson; W Ryan; P G Turner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Observations on removal of metal implants.

Authors:  R H Richards; J D Palmer; N M Clarke
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Refracture after the removal of plates from the forearm. An avoidable complication.

Authors:  J W Rosson; J R Shearer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-05

4.  Healing of residual screw holes after plate removal.

Authors:  J Rosson; W Murphy; C Tonge; J Shearer
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Bone structure after removal of internal fixation plates.

Authors:  J W Rosson; G W Petley; J R Shearer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-01
  5 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Implant removal after intramedullary osteosyntheses. Literature review, technical details, and tips and tricks].

Authors:  C Krettek; P Mommsen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Hardware removal after tibial fracture has healed.

Authors:  Adam Sidky; Richard E Buckley
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Igor Immerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Return to Sport After Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Evidence Appraisal.

Authors:  Luke Geoghegan; Alexander Scarborough; Jeremy N Rodrigues; Mike J Hayton; Maxim D Horwitz
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Chris van der Werken; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Conservative surgical management of simple monostotic fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur in a 19-year-old basketballer: a case report.

Authors:  David Yung; Kazutaka Kikuta; Tetsuya Sekita; Naofumi Asano; Robert Nakayama; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2018-08-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.