Literature DB >> 9428871

A comparison of gasless mechanical and conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum methods for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A M Koivusalo1, I Kellokumpu, M Scheinin, I Tikkanen, H Mäkisalo, L Lindgren.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation with increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) has adverse hemodynamic, pulmonary, and renal effects. To avoid these problems, an abdominal wall lift method with a retractor was used to provide the surgical view without CO2 insufflation. Twenty-six patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to either the gasless, retractor group, or conventional CO2 pneumoperitoneum group (CPP). Hemodynamic data, ventilatory variables, urine output, urine oxygen tension, and blood samples for determining stress hormones were collected throughout the perioperative period. Patients in the retractor group had lower mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and central venous pressure (P < 0.001). They also had higher pulmonary dynamic compliance and needed a lower minute volume of ventilation to achieve normocarbia (P < 0.001). Urine output and oxygen tension in urine were higher (P < 0.05) with the retractor method than with CPP. Increase in plasma renin activity (P < 0.05) and decrease in core temperature (P < 0.001) were smaller with the gasless method than with CPP. The gasless method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy might be beneficial, especially in patients with compromised cardiorespiratory or renal function. IMPLICATIONS: Totally gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared with conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum with CO2 insufflation. The gasless method resulted in more stable hemodynamics and pulmonary function, as well as higher urine, output than conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum. No changes in renal oxygenation was seen with the gasless method, compared with conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9428871     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199801000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  15 in total

1.  Operative stress response and energy metabolism after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Kai Luo; Jie-Shou Li; Ling-Tang Li; Kei-Hui Wang; Jing-Mei Shun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  ["Does minimally invasive surgery really imply minimally invasive anaesthesia?"].

Authors:  T Koch; R J Litz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Management of benign ovarian cysts by a novel, gasless, single-incision laparoscopic technique: keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery (KARS).

Authors:  Kahraman Ülker; Ürfettin Hüseyinoğlu; Nergiz Kılıç
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Cardiovascular dynamics during peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a prospective observational study using non-invasive finger cuff-derived pulse wave analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Christina Vokuhl; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Thomas Rösch; Martin Petzoldt; Benjamin Löser
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Effects of hypercapnia on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Ji-Seon Son; Ji-Yun Oh; Seonghoon Ko
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Systemic response in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using gasless or carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum: a randomized study.

Authors:  Jens Fromholt Larsen; Per Ejstrud; Flemming Svendsen; Vivi Pedersen; Finn Redke
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Flemming Bjerrum; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Abdominal wall-lifting versus CO2 pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopy: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Ren; Yao Tong; Xi-Bing Ding; Xin Wang; Shu-Qing Jin; Xiao-Yin Niu; Xiang Zhao; Quan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-06-15

10.  Laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy under thoracic epidural-general anesthesia leading to the effects on postoperative micturition.

Authors:  Sung Jin Lee; Woo Jin Hyung; Bon Nyeo Koo; Ji Yeon Lee; Na Hyung Jun; Sun Chung Kim; Jung Won Kim; Jia Liu; Ki Jun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.