OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of bilevel positive airway pressure support in critically ill children with underlying medical conditions. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS: Thirty-four patients (6 mos to 20 yrs, mean 11.06 +/- 0.9 yrs) with impending respiratory failure were enrolled in the study. All patients required airway or oxygenation/ventilation support (awake or asleep) and required admission to our pediatric ICU. Each patient served as his or her own control. Exclusion criteria were absent cough or gag reflex, multiple organ system failure, age of <6 mos, vocal cord paralysis, and noncooperation with nasal mask. INTERVENTIONS: Bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with 35 episodes of respiratory insufficiency requiring airway support or oxygenation/ventilatory support were treated with bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation. Dyspnea score decreased at least two deviations in all patients; dyspnea score decreased five deviations in 67% of patients. Resting heart rate decreased from 126 +/- 3.2 to 102 +/- 3.2 beats/min (p < .001), respiratory rate decreased from 39 +/- 3 to 25 +/- 1 breaths/min (p < .004), bicarbonate concentrations decreased from 30.0 +/- 1.0 to 24.0 +/- 0.7 mmol/L (p < .01), and room air saturation increased from 85 +/- 2% to 97 +/- 1%. Bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation failure was characterized by an inability to stabilize progression of respiratory failure and the subsequent placement of an artificial airway. Three patients required placement of an artificial airway. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in respiratory rate, heart rate, and dyspnea score and an improvement in oxygenation were noted in >90% of patients studied, resulting in only an 8% frequency of intubation. The efficacy of bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation in selected groups of patients indicates the need to include this form of noninvasive pressure support ventilation in the care offered by pediatric ICUs.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of bilevel positive airway pressure support in critically ill children with underlying medical conditions. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS: Thirty-four patients (6 mos to 20 yrs, mean 11.06 +/- 0.9 yrs) with impending respiratory failure were enrolled in the study. All patients required airway or oxygenation/ventilation support (awake or asleep) and required admission to our pediatric ICU. Each patient served as his or her own control. Exclusion criteria were absent cough or gag reflex, multiple organ system failure, age of <6 mos, vocal cord paralysis, and noncooperation with nasal mask. INTERVENTIONS: Bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with 35 episodes of respiratory insufficiency requiring airway support or oxygenation/ventilatory support were treated with bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation. Dyspnea score decreased at least two deviations in all patients; dyspnea score decreased five deviations in 67% of patients. Resting heart rate decreased from 126 +/- 3.2 to 102 +/- 3.2 beats/min (p < .001), respiratory rate decreased from 39 +/- 3 to 25 +/- 1 breaths/min (p < .004), bicarbonate concentrations decreased from 30.0 +/- 1.0 to 24.0 +/- 0.7 mmol/L (p < .01), and room air saturation increased from 85 +/- 2% to 97 +/- 1%. Bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation failure was characterized by an inability to stabilize progression of respiratory failure and the subsequent placement of an artificial airway. Three patients required placement of an artificial airway. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in respiratory rate, heart rate, and dyspnea score and an improvement in oxygenation were noted in >90% of patients studied, resulting in only an 8% frequency of intubation. The efficacy of bilevel positive airway pressure support ventilation in selected groups of patients indicates the need to include this form of noninvasive pressure support ventilation in the care offered by pediatric ICUs.
Authors: Abby M Williams; Thomas J Abramo; Malee V Shah; Renee A Miller; Cheryl Burney-Jones; Samantha Rooks; Cristina Estrada; Donald H Arnold Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Juan I Muñoz-Bonet; Eva M Flor-Macián; Patricia M Roselló; Mari C Llopis; Alicia Lizondo; José L López-Prats; Juan Brines Journal: World J Pediatr Date: 2010-06-12 Impact factor: 2.764
Authors: Juan Mayordomo-Colunga; Alberto Medina; Corsino Rey; Juan José Díaz; Andrés Concha; Marta Los Arcos; Sergio Menéndez Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 17.440